Judith Gail Talacko (as Appointed Representative of the Estate of Jan Emil Talacko) v Alexandra Bennett and Others
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | Kiefel CJ,Bell,Keane,Gordon,Edelman JJ.,Gageler J.,Nettle J. |
| Judgment Date | 03 May 2017 |
| Neutral Citation | [2017] HCA 15 |
| Docket Number | M154/2016 |
| Court | High Court |
| Date | 03 May 2017 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
2 cases
-
Commissioner of Taxation v Yeo (Trustee) (No 2)
...VSC 57; 209 FLR 1 Rogers v Asset Loan Co Pty Ltd [2006] FCA 434; 4 ABC(NS) 293 Story v Lane [1981] HCA 47; 147 CLR 549 Talacko v Bennett [2017] HCA 15; 260 CLR 124 Date of hearing: 22 July 2019 Registry: Victoria Division: General Division National Practice commencement of and engagement in......
-
Johnson v Powrie
...[1961] ALR 886 Spain v Union Steamship Company of New Zealand Ltd (1923) 32 CLR 138 Storey v Lane (1981) 147 CLR 549 Talacko v Bennett [2017] HCA 15; 91 ALJR 564 Tarea Management (North Shore) Pty Ltd (in liq) v Glass (1991) 28 FCR 93 Technical Products Pty Ltd v State Government Insurance ......
2 firm's commentaries
-
Inside Track: Property & Real Estate - In the media, Published research, In practice and courts, recent Cases and Legislation
...'final and unappealable' for purposes of foreign law, notwithstanding stay – judgment 'final and unappealable' – Talacko v Bennett [2017] HCA 15; (2017) 260 CLR 124, Zekry v Zekry [2020] VSC 221 EQUITY & TRUSTS – common intention constructive trust – joint endeavour constructive trust – fin......
-
Australian High Court supports statutory stay on enforcement outside of Australia of Australian judgments
...Talacko v Bennett [2017] HCA 15, the Australian High Court decided that the Australian courts would not allow applications to enforce an Australian civil court judgment in a foreign jurisdiction where the debtor has become bankrupt in Australia. This is because the Court found that the Bank......