JWR Productions Australia Pty Ltd v Duncan-Watt (No 2)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeTHAWLEY J
Judgment Date05 March 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCA 236
CourtFederal Court
Date05 March 2020


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


JWR Productions Australia Pty Ltd v Duncan-Watt (No 2) [2020] FCA 236


File numbers:


NSD 266 of 2017NSD 327 of 2017



Judge:

THAWLEY J



Date of judgment:

5 March 2020



Catchwords:

DEFAMATION – hybrid publication – Facebook Post providing a link to a newspaper article – whether imputations conveyed – one defamatory imputation conveyed


DEFAMATION – defences – justification – defence made out – where respondent pleaded four contextual imputations – whether the alleged contextual imputations were conveyed – two contextual imputations conveyed which were substantially true – whether the contextual imputations operate as a complete or partial defence – fair comment and honest opinion – defence not made out – publication of public documents – defence not made out


CONSUMER LAW – claim under Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) Sch 2, Australian Consumer Law (ACL) for misleading or deceptive conduct –representations made to a journalist – representations in a Facebook Post which provided a link to a newspaper article – whether conduct was “in trade or commerce” – whether the representations were in fact conveyed by the relevant conduct – whether representation a statement of fact or opinion – whether the representations conveyed were misleading or deceptive or likely to mislead or deceive


CONSUMER LAW – claim under the ACL for misleading or deceptive conduct – whether website content conveyed representations about authorship of a novel – whether the conduct was in “trade or commerce” – whether the representations were in fact conveyed by the relevant conduct – claim for declaratory relief – whether any benefit to making of the declaration – whether financial loss or damage sustained from the conduct – declaratory relief refused


COPYRIGHT – whether infringement of copyright – whether the work was an adaption – claim for injunctive relief – copyright claim dismissed


COPYRIGHT – whether use of photographs on website was an infringement of copyright – whether copyright was assigned as alleged – whether licence granted – where photographs removed a reasonable time after demand


TORTS – detinue – whether property wrongfully detained – whether sufficient demand made – whether respondent made clear and unqualified refusal to comply with the demand – whether the refusal to comply was unreasonable – whether goods were detained for a reasonable time



Legislation:

Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 6(3), Sch 2 cl 18

Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) ss 10, 13, 31, 36, 115, 196

Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) ss 4, 25, 26, 28

Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) s 4, Div 2 ss 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, Div 3 ss 33, 34



Cases cited:

.au Domain Administration Ltd v Domain Names Australia Pty Ltd (2004) 207 ALR 521

ACCC v Coles Supermarkets (Australia) Pty Ltd (2014) 317 ALR 73

ACCC v Kimberly‑Clark Australia Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 992

ACCC v Telstra Corp Ltd (2007) 244 ALR 470

ACCC v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640

Adidas AG v Pacific Brands Footwear Pty Ltd (No 4) (2013) 308 ALR 143

Amalgamated Television Services v Marsden (1998) 43 NSWLR 158

Anyanwu and Another v South Bank Student Union and Another (No 2), The Times Law Reports, December 5, 2003, 678

Aqua-Marine Marketing Pty Ltd v Pacific Reef Fisheries (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 5) [2012] FCA 908

Bank of New South Wales v The Commonwealth (1948) 76 CLR 1

Banks v Ferrari [2000] NSWSC 874

Besser v Kermode (2011) NSWLR 157

Brisbane City Council v Group Projects Pty Ltd (1979) 145 CLR 143

Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 592

Campbell v Backoffice Investments Pty Ltd (2009) 238 CLR 304

Chakravarti v Advertiser Newspapers Ltd (1998) 193 CLR 519

Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd v Manock (2007) 232 CLR 245

Channel Seven Sydney Pty Ltd v Mahommed (2010) 278 ALR 232

Civil Service Co-operative Society of Victoria Ltd v Blyth (1914) 17 CLR 601

Clayton v Le Roy [1911] 2 K B 1031

Codelfa Construction Pty Ltd v State Rail Authority of NSW (1982) 149 CLR 337

Computermate Products (Aust) Pty Ltd v Ozi-Soft Pty Ltd (1988) 20 FCR 46

Con-Stan Industries of Australia Pty Ltd v Norwich Winterthur Insurance (Australia) Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 226

Concrete Constructions (NSW) Pty Ltd v Nelson (1990) 169 CLR 594

Cross v Queensland Newspapers Pty Ltd [2008] NSWCA 80

Cummings v Fairfax Digital Australia & New Zealand Pty Ltd [2017] NSWSC 657

Cummings v Fairfax Digital Australia & New Zealand Pty Ltd (2018) 99 NSWLR 173

David v Abdishou [2012] NSWCA 109

David Syme & Co v Canavan (1918) 25 CLR 234

Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham Urban District Council [1956] AC 696

Derry v Peek (1889) 14 App Cas 337

DGM Commodities Corp v Sea Metropolitan SA (The “Andra”) [2012] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 587

Dow Jones & Co Inc v Gutnick (2002) 210 CLR 575

Dyno Nobel Inc v Orica Explosives Technology Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 1552

E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan Australia Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 934

EE McCurdy Ltd (in liq) v Postmaster-General [1959] NZLR 553

E W Savory Ltd v World of Golf Ltd [1914] 2 Ch 566

Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Ltd (2014) 251 CLR 640

Flowfill Packaging Machines Pty Ltd v Fytore Pty Ltd (1993) Aust Torts Reports 81-244

Given v Pryor (1979) 24 ALR 442

Goodman v Boycott (1862) 2 B & S 1

Google Inc v ACCC (2013) 429 CLR 435

Greenfield Products Pty Ltd v Rover Scott Bonnar Ltd (1990) 95 ALR 275

Grundt v Great Boulder Proprietary Gold Mines Limited (1937) 59 CLR 641

Hall-Gibbs Mercantile Agency Ltd v Dun (1910) 12 CLR 84

Hockey v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (2015) 237 FCR 33

Houghland v RR Low (Luxury Coaches) Ltd [1962] 1 QB 694

Hunter BNZ Finance Ltd v CG Maloney Pty Ltd (1988) 18 NSWLR 420

John F Goulding Pty Ltd v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1932) 48 CLR 157

John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Obeid (2005) 64 NSWLR 485

Lewis v Daily Telegraph Ltd [1964] AC 234

Louis Vuitton Malletier SA v Knierum [2004] FCA 1584

Madden v Seafolly Pty Ltd (2014) 313 ALR 1

Mirror Newspapers Ltd v Harrison (1982) 149 CLR 293

Mirror Newspapers Ltd v World Hosts Pty Ltd (1979) 141 CLR 632

Nelson & Anor v Nelson [1923] St R Qd 37

Nine Films & Television Pty Ltd v Ninox Television Ltd [2005] FCA 1404

O’Brien v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (2017) 97 NSWLR 1

Oliver v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 583

oOh! Media Roadside Pty Ltd (formerly Power Panels Pty Ltd) v Diamond Wheels Pty Ltd (2011) 32 VR 255

Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191

Plimer v Roberts (1997) 80 FCR 303

Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd v Chesterton (2009) 238 CLR 460

Reader’s Digest Services Pty Ltd v Lamb (1982) 150 CLR 500

Ross McConnel Kitchen & Co Pty...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 cases
  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Select AFSL Pty Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 8 July 2022
    ...[1978] HCA 11; (1978) 140 CLR 216 Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; (1959) 101 CLR 298 JWR Productions Australia Pty Ltd v Duncan-Watt (No 2) [2020] FCA 236; (2020) 377 ALR 467 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 11; (2011) 243 CLR 361 Lisciandro v Official Trustee in Bankr......
  • Dutton v Bazzi
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 24 November 2021
    ...[1959] HCA 8; (1959) 101 CLR 298 Joseph v Spiller [2010] UKSC 53; [2011] 1 AC 852 JWR Productions Australia Pty Ltd v Duncan‑Watt (No 2) [2020] FCA 236; (2020) 377 ALR 467 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 11; (2011) 243 CLR 361 London Artists Ltd v Littler [1969] 2 ......
  • Tucker v McKee
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 23 July 2021
    ...v Nine Network Australia Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 583 Prasad v Google LLC [2020] FCA 67 Productions Australia Pty Ltd v Duncan-Watt (No 2) [2020] FCA 236; 377 ALR 467 R v Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration; Ex parte Barrett [1945] HCA 50; 70 CLR 141 Rana v Google Inc [2017] FCAFC ......
  • Molan v Dailymail.com Australia Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 30 August 2022
    ...Publications Pty Ltd v O’Shane [2005] NSWCA 164; (2005) Aust Torts Reports 81-789 JWR Productions Australia Pty Ltd v Duncan-Watt (No 2) [2020] FCA 236; 377 ALR 467 Lewis v Daily Telegraph [1964] AC 234 Massoud v Nationwide News Pty Ltd; Massoud v Fox Sports Australia Pty Ltd [2022] NSWCA 1......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries