Kable v DPP for Nsw

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date1996
Neutral Citation1996-0912 HCA A,[1996] HCA 24
Year1996
Date1996
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
228 cases
  • North Australian Aboriginal Legal Aid Service Inc. v Bradley
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Silbert v DPP (Wa)
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 3 March 2004
    ...or any sufficient inquiry into whether the deceased committed the offence — Whether State law invokes the principles in Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR 51. Criminal law — Confiscation of profits — Person charged with ‘serious offence’ dies before charge finally ......
  • Featherston v Tully
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of South Australia
    • Invalid date
  • Re Colina;ex parte Torney
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Continuing detention orders in New South Wales
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 24 October 2022
    ...regime was 'unconstitutional' and breached principles previously set out in the case of: Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR 51. These principles enforce that a separation between the powers of the government and judiciary is necessary, and that a state cannot impos......
  • Breaching a serious crime prevention order in New South Wales
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 28 May 2023
    ...of judicial independence and the 'separation of powers' has been set out in the case of: Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR 51. It essentially states that separation between the powers of the government and judiciary is necessary, and that a state cannot impose a n......
88 books & journal articles
  • Mandatory sentencing for people smuggling: issues of law and policy.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 36 No. 2, August 2012
    • 1 August 2012
    ...valid. See also Waterside Workers' Federation of Australia v J W Alexander Ltd (1918) 25 CLR 434, 444 (Griffith CJ); Kable v DPP (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR 51, 98 (Toohey J); Nicholas v The Queen (1998) 193 CLR 173, 186-7 (Brennan CJ); Chu Kheng Lira v Minister for Immigration, Local Government a......
  • Judicial review of migration decisions: ousting the Hickman private clause?
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 26 No. 3, December 2002
    • 1 December 2002
    ...Amendment Bill (No 5) 1997 (1997) 31. (67) Campbell, above n 28, 146. (68) Abebe (1999) 197 CLR 510, 536. (69) Kable v DPP (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR 51,108 (Gaudron (70) Abebe (1999) 197 CLR 510, 587 (Kirby J). (71) (1991) 171 CLR232,308. (72) Campbell, above n 28, 146. (73) Richard Waiter (1995......
  • Attributes and Attribution of State Courts — Federalism and the Kable Principle
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 40-1, March 2012
    • 1 March 2012
    ...conception as a constituent unit of the federation. The principle first articulated in Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (1996) 189 CLR 51 ensures the institutional integrity of state courts by protecting from legislative impairment their defining chara cteristics as 'courts'. I......
  • The Centralisation of Judicial Power within the Australian Federal System
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 42-2, June 2014
    • 1 June 2014
    ...when its Chapter III Functions are Exhausted?’ (2014) 42 Federal Law Review 121. 73 Subject to valid exceptions and regulations. 74 (1996) 189 CLR 51 (‘Kable’). 75 See recently, eg, Gabrielle Appleby and John Williams, ‘A New Coat of Paint: Law and Order and the Refurbishment of Kable’ (201......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT