Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeFrench CJ,Hayne,Crennan,Kiefel,Bell,Gageler,Keane JJ.
Judgment Date05 June 2013
Neutral Citation[2013] HCA 25,2013-0605 HCA A
Docket NumberM117/2012
Date05 June 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
75 cases
  • Smethurst v Commissioner of Police
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • April 15, 2020
    ...264 [42]–[43], 267 [49] per Gaudron, Gummow and Kirby JJ. 198 (1986) 4 NSWLR 457 at 463. 199 See, eg, Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 392 at 400 [14], 426 [123], 437 [152] per French CJ, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel, Bell, Gageler and Keane JJ; Paciocco v Australia & New Zealand Bank......
  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Kobelt
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • June 12, 2019
    ...10 Kobelt v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2018) 352 ALR 689 at 741 [296]. 11 (2015) 236 FCR 199 at 274 [296]. 12 (2013) 250 CLR 392 at 427 [124]; [2013] HCA 13 (2017) 91 ALJR 1260 at 1272 [38]; 350 ALR 1 at 13; [2017] HCA 49. 14 Thorne v Kennedy (2017) 91 ALJR 1260 at 12......
  • Good Living Company Pty Ltd as trustee for the Warren Duncan Trust No 3 v Kingsmede Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • March 16, 2021
    ...Australia v Kojic [2016] FCAFC 186; 249 FCR 421 Jenyns v Public Curator (Qld) [1953] HCA 2; 90 CLR 113 Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited [2013] HCA 25; 250 CLR 392 Monroe Topple & Associates Pty Ltd v Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia [2002] FCAFC 197; 122 FCR 110 O’Sullivan v......
  • Thorne v Kennedy
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • November 8, 2017
    ...at 675. 57 Zamet v Hyman [1961] 1 WLR 1442 at 1446; [1961] 3 All ER 933 at 937–938. 58 (1992) 175 CLR 621 at 630; [1992] HCA 61. 59 (2013) 250 CLR 392 ; [2013] HCA 60 Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio (1983) 151 CLR 447 at 462 per Mason J; [1983] HCA 14. 61 Cory v Cory (1747) 1 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
  • Competition & Consumer Law News – 5 July 2017
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • July 6, 2017
    ...HCA 81; (1956) 99 CLR 362; Commercial Bank of Australia Ltd v Amadio [1983] HCA 14; (1983) 151 CLR 447; Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd [2013] HCA 25; (2013) 250 CLR 392 considered and applied. CONSUMER PROTECTION - Whether a credit contract between Bank and customer was one to which Consumer......
  • Hobson's Choice? Statutory Unconscionability Revisited In ASIC v Kobelt
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • October 31, 2019
    ...other authorities, the High Court's decisions in Thorne v Kennedy [2017] HCA 49; (2017) 91 ALJR 1260 and Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd [2013] HCA 25; (2013) 250 CLR 392. See also Kiefel CJ and Bell J at [15], Nettle and Gordon JJ at [145]-[153] and Edelman J at [4] At [14], [49] (per Kiefel......
  • 'No Deal': Kakavas loses High Court appeal
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • June 9, 2013
    ...Solicitor, of Addisons in the preparation of this article is noted and greatly appreciated. Footnotes 1Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited [2013] HCA 25. 2Kakavas v Crown Ltd [2007] VSC 526. 3Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited & Ors [2009] VSC 559. 4Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Limited & ......
6 books & journal articles
  • CONSUMER PROTECTION, STATUTE AND
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal Nbr. 2016, December 2016
    • December 1, 2016
    ...Consumer Commission v CG Berbatis Holdings Pty Ltd[2003] HCA 18; (2003) 214 CLR 51 at 64, per Gleeson CJ. 91Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd[2013] HCA 25; (2013) 250 CLR 392 at 401, [19]. See also Tanwar Enterprises Pty Ltd v Cauchi[2003] HCA 57; (2003) 217 CLR 315 at 325–326, [26], per Gleeso......
  • EQUITY AND OPPORTUNISM IN THE LAW OF CONTRACT:
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal Nbr. 2018, December 2018
    • December 1, 2018
    ...Piggott(1995) 69 P & CR 298 as at 2 December 2017. 227 [2015] EWHC 1454. 228 Minder Music Ltd v Sharples [2015] EWHC 1454 at [32]. 229 (2013) 298 ALR 35; HCA 25. 230 See further Warren Swain, “The Unconscionable Dealing Doctrine: In Retreat?” (2014) 31 JCL 255. 231 See para 26 above. 232 Sa......
  • Kakavas v. Crown Melbourne Ltd: still curbing unconscionability; Kakavas in the High Court of Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 37 Nbr. 2, August - August 2013
    • August 1, 2013
    ...diluted the ameliorative potential of the Amadio principle and, of course, of s 20 of the ACL through it. Rick Bigwood ([dagger]) * (2013) 298 ALR 35 ([dagger]) LLB (Hons) (Auckland), PhD ( ANU ); Professor, Faculty of Law, Bond University. I am grateful to two anonymous referees for th......
  • Common law divergences.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 37 Nbr. 2, August - August 2013
    • August 1, 2013
    ...(78) See Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v CG Berbatis Holdings Pty Ltd (2003) 214 CLR 51; Kakavas v Crown Melbourne Ltd (2013) 298 ALR 35. (79) See Australian Consumer Law pt 2-2; UCC [section] 2-302 (US). On Canadian law, see generally G H L Fridman, The Law of Contract in ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT