Al-Kateb v Godwin

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ.,McHugh J.,Gummow J.,Kirby J.,Hayne J.,Callinan J.,Heydon J.
Judgment Date06 August 2004
Neutral Citation[2004] HCA 37,2004-0806 HCA A
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberA253/2003
Date06 August 2004
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
176 cases
58 books & journal articles
  • Mandatory sentencing for people smuggling: issues of law and policy.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 36 No. 2, August 2012
    • 1 Agosto 2012
    ...Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 16A(1). (389) PlaintiffS157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476, 492 [30] (Gleeson CJ); Al-Kateb v Godwin (2004) 219 CLR 562, 577 [19]-[20] (Gleeson CJ); Lacey v A-G (Qld) (2011) 242 CLR 573, 582-3 [18] (French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ); Byrn......
  • 'An "alien" by the barest of threads' - the legality of the deportation of long-term residents from Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 33 No. 2, August 2009
    • 1 Agosto 2009
    ...account international law, including international human rights law, in interpreting constitutional terms: see, eg, Al-Kateb v Godwin (2004) 219 CLR 562, 6234 (Kirby J). Indeed, in the later case of Koroitamana v Commonwealth (2006) 227 CLR 31, 50, his Honour stated: 'I accept that the Aust......
  • National litigation and international law: repercussions for Australia's protection of marine resources.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 33 No. 1, April 2009
    • 1 Abril 2009
    ...collectively as 'HSI v Kyodo'. (3) (2006) 93 ALD 640. (4) (2003) 126 FCR 354. (5) In the Australian context, see, eg, Al-Kateb v Godwin (2004) 219 CLR 562, in particular the contrasting views of McHugh and Kirby JJ on the role of international law: at 589-95 (McHugh J), 617-30 (Kirby J). Se......
  • Tiptoeing through the Tripwires: Recent Developments in Jurisdictional Error
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 44-3, September 2016
    • 1 Septiembre 2016
    ...framework, merely serves to restate and not to answer the P eko-Wallsend test. 221 For reasons not disclosed in the decision. 222 (2004) 219 CLR 562. 223 NBMZ (2014) 220 FCR 1, 6 (Allsop CJ and Katzmann J), 39 (Buchanan J). 224 (1986) 162 CLR 24, 40 (‘Peko-Wallsend’). 225 NBMZ (2014) 220 FC......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT