He Kaw Teh v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 1985 |
| Neutral Citation | [1985] HCA 43,1985-0711 HCA B |
| Date | 1985 |
| Year | 1985 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
138 cases
-
Tabe v R
...the concept of knowledge requires further definition. What is it that amounts to knowledge? And what is it that must be known? InHe Kaw Teh v The Queen10, Gibbs CJ, after reviewing the authorities, concluded that: ‘[W]here a statute makes it an offence to have possession of particular goods......
- Zecevic v Director Ofpublic Prosecutions (Victoria)
- Adams v Eta Foods Ltd
- Australian Federation of Air Pilots v Australian Airlines Ltd
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Define Intimidation in Australia
...will need to be considered on its own facts and circumstances. Courts define Intimidation and intent as well. In He Kaw Teh v The Queen [1985] HCA 43, the Court recognised that it would be difficult to prove a state of mind in the absence of admissions that one intended to (or knew the acti......
11 books & journal articles
-
A PURPOSIVE APPROACH TO INTERPRETING AUSTRALIA'S COMPLEMENTARY PROTECTION REGIME.
...Rosemary Owens and John Williams (eds), Intention in Law and Philosophy (Ashgate, 2001) 107, 109-10. See also He Kaw Teh v The Queen (1985) 157 CLR 523, 568 (Brennan J) ('He Kaw (73) Zaburoni (n 67); SZTAL (n 3). (74) Zaburoni (n 67) 488 [8] (Kiefel, Bell and Keane JJ), citing R v Willmot [......
-
NO PUNISHMENT WITHOUT FAULT
...if it was done by mistake or by accident. 51 (1946) 62 TLR 462. 52 Brend v Wood (1946) 62 TLR 462 at 463. 53 He Kaw Teh v The Queen (1985) 157 CLR 523 at 568. 54 [2000] 2 AC 428. 55 B (a minor) v Director of Public Prosecutions [2000] 2 AC 428 at 464, per Lord Nicholls. 56 Bridges Christoph......
-
Rape in Victoria as a Crime of Absolute Liability: A Departure from Both Precedent and Progressivism
...to an issue in the case or the credit of the complainant isNew South Wales: Criminal Procedure Act 1986 (NSW), s. 293.31 He Kaw Teh v R(1985) 157 CLR 523 at 533, 590. All strict liability offences arestatutory as there is none recognised at common law.32 P. Gillies, Criminal Law, 4th edn (L......
-
The Paradox of Disallowing Duress as a Defence to Murder
...the various governments to act on the proposal set out above. 60 R v Hurley and Murray [1967] VR 526 at 533.61 He Kaw Teh v The Queen (1985) 157 CLR 523 at 534.62 Gillies, above n. 15 at 42.63 Except, of course, for the requirement that the offence is not murder or some other offence so hei......
Get Started for Free