Keeley v Brooking

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation[1979] HCA 28,1979-0621 HCA B
Year1979
Date1979

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
16 cases
  • The Queen(Appellant) v Gerard Robert Baden-Clay
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 31 August 2016
    ...King (1936) 55 CLR 253 at 266; [1936] HCA 24; Sparre v The King (1942) 66 CLR 149 at 154; [1942] HCA 19; Keeley v Mr Justice Brooking (1979) 143 CLR 162 at 188; [1979] HCA 28; Chamberlain v The Queen [No 2] (1984) 153 CLR 521 at 601; MacKenzie v The Queen (1996) 190 CLR 348 at 365; [1996] H......
  • Trevor Jenkins(Appellant) v Robert Whittington
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • 21 August 2017
    ...v The Queen [1984] NSWLR 212, Grassby v The Queen (1989) 168 CLR 1, Hinch v Attorney-General (Vic) (1987) 164 CLR 15, Keeley v Brooking (1979) 143 CLR 162, MacGroarty v Clauson (1989) 167 CLR 251, Magistrates' Court at Prahran v Murphy [1997] 2 VR 186, O'Brien v Northern Territory (2003) 17......
  • Nulyarimma v Thompson; Buzzacott v Minister for the Environment
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 1 September 1999
    ...Recent cases of criminal contempt of court are an example: see La Trobe University v Robinson [1972] VR 883; Keeley v Justice Brooking (1979) 143 CLR 162; 25 ALR 45; Gallagher v Durak (1983) 152 CLR 238; 45 ALR 53; Hinch v Attorney-General [1987] VR 721 and Hinch v Attorney-General (Vic) (1......
  • Ogawa v Attorney General (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 28 June 2019
    ...Jarratt v Commissioner of Police for New South Wales (2005) 224 CLR 44 Jesser v Chief of Air Force (2015) 300 FLR 218 Keeley v Brooking (1979) 143 CLR 162 Lewis v Attorney General of Jamaica [2001] 2 AC 50 Martens v Commonwealth of Australia (2009) 174 FCR 114 Masson v Parsons [2019] HCA 21......
  • Get Started for Free