Kelly, in the matter of Halifax Investment Services Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (No 9)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGLEESON J
Judgment Date02 July 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCA 925
CourtFederal Court
Date02 July 2020
Kelly, in the matter of Halifax Investment Services Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (No 9) [2020] FCA 925

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Kelly, in the matter of Halifax Investment Services Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (No 9) [2020] FCA 925


File number:

NSD 2191 of 2018



Judge:

GLEESON J



Date of judgment:

2 July 2020



Catchwords:

INSOLVENCY – application by liquidator – Div 60 of Pt 3 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations) to the Corporations Act (2001) (Cth) –– determination of appropriate source of funds for payment of liquidation costs and expenses– reasonableness of liquidators remuneration

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – order under s 54A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1979 (Cth) –appointment of referee – determination of costs by referee – conduct of inquiry – form of written report



Legislation:

Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations) to the Corporations Act (2001) (Cth) ss 60-05, 60-10(1)(c), 60-10(3)(b), 60-10(4), 60-12, 60-15, 90-15, 90-23(6), 90-23(7), 90-26(4)

Federal Court of Australia Act 1979 (Cth) ss 37M, 54A

Insolvency Practice Rules (Corporations) 2016 rr 28.65(7), 28.67, 90-7(2)



Cases cited:

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Italian Prestige Jewellers Pty Ltd [2018[ FCA 983

In the matter of Primespace Property Investment Limited (in liquidation) [2016] NSWSC 1821

Kadam and ors v MiiResorts Group 1 Pty Ltd (No 4) [2017] FCA 1139; 252 FCR 298

Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 558; (2012) 203 FCR 520

Re Roslea Path Ltd (in liquidation) [2013] 1 NZLR 207

Venetian Nominees Pty Ltd v Conlan (1998) 20 WAR 96; (1998) 16 ACLC 1653



Date of hearing:

22 May 2020



Registry:

New South Wales



Division:

General Division



National Practice Area:

Commercial and Corporations



Sub-area:

Corporations and Corporate Insolvency



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

67



Counsel for the Plaintiffs:

E Holmes and C Trahanas



Solicitor for the Plaintiffs:

K&L Gates



Counsel for the First Defendant:

E Hyde



Solicitor for the First Defendant:

Maddocks



Counsel for the Second Defendant:

A Kawolski



Solicitor for the Second Defendant:

Turks Legal



Counsel for the Third Defendant:

A Munro



Solicitor for the Third Defendant:

Murdoch Clarke



Solicitor for the Fourth Defendant:

E Phelan of Gilbert + Tobin



Counsel for the Fifth Defendant:

S Munro



Solicitor for the Fifth Defendant:

Anderson Lloyd



Counsel for the Sixth and Seventh Defendants:

EL Smith



Solicitors for the Sixth and Seventh Defendants:

Tailored Legal Solutions Limited


ORDERS


NSD 2191 of 2018

IN THE MATTER OF HALIFAX INVESTMENT SERVICES PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 096 980 522)

BETWEEN:

MORGAN JOHN KELLY AND PHILIP ALEXANDER QUINLAN AS JOINT AND SEVERAL LIQUIDATORS OF HALIFAX INVESTMENT SERVICES PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 096 980 522)

First and Second Plaintiffs


HALIFAX INVESTMENT SERVICES PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 096 980 522)

Third Plaintiff


AND:

CHOO BOON LOO

First Defendant


ELYSIUM BUSINESS SYSTEMS PTY LTD (ACN 110 669 282)

Second Defendant


JASON PAUL HINGSTON (and others named in the Schedule)

Third Defendant



JUDGE:

GLEESON J

DATE OF ORDER:

2 July 2020



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

Source of funds
  1. Pursuant to s 90-15 of the Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations), being Sch 2 to the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (IPS), the first and second plaintiffs (liquidators) are justified in applying the following funds in the specified accounts of investors of Halifax Investment Services Pty Ltd (In Liquidation) (Halifax AU) and Halifax New Zealand Limited (In Liquidation) (Halifax NZ) to their remuneration, costs and expenses and the legal expenses reasonably incurred by the first, second, third, fourth, and fifth defendants in acting as representative defendants, to the extent that the funds are held by Halifax AU or the liquidators on behalf of Halifax AU:

    1. Australian dollars (AUD) in client accounts on the Interactive Brokers AU trading platform (IB AU) and Interactive Brokers NZ trading platform (IB NZ), which hold only AUD as a base currency, have positive cash balances and have no open positions;

    2. AUD in client accounts on IB AU and IB NZ, which hold AUD as the base currency and have open positions comprised entirely of cash in other currencies and where all cash balances are positive;

    3. US dollars (USD) in client accounts on IB NZ, which hold only USD as a base currency, have positive cash balances and have no open positions;

    4. USD in client accounts on IB NZ, which hold USD as the base currency and have open positions comprised entirely of cash in other currencies and where all cash balances are positive;

    5. New Zealand dollars (NZD) in client accounts on IB NZ, which hold only NZD as a base currency, have positive cash balances and have no open positions; and

    6. NZD in client accounts on IB NZ, which hold NZD as the base currency and have open positions comprised entirely of cash in other currencies and where all cash balances are positive.

Referral to referee
  1. Pursuant to s 54A of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) (FCA Act), the following questions be referred to Tony Tesoriero (referee) for inquiry and report in accordance with the Rules of Court:

    1. whether the remuneration of the liquidators, set out in the Report on Remuneration and Internal Disbursements for the period September 2019 to November 2019 dated 18 February 2020 is reasonable, taking into account any or all of the matters listed in s 60-12 of the IPS and, if not, what remuneration is reasonable?

    2. whether the remuneration claimed by the liquidators, set out in the Report on Remuneration and Internal Disbursements for the period December 2019 to May 2020 is reasonable, taking into account any or all of the matters listed in s 60-12 of the IPS and, if not, what remuneration is reasonable?

    3. whether the remuneration claimed by the liquidators, for the period June 2020 to August 2020 is reasonable, taking into account any or all of the matters...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex