Kennedy v Wallace

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2004-1223 FCA C,2004-0325 FCA D
Year2004
Date2004
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
61 cases
  • Awb Ltd v Cole (No 5)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • The RBS Rights Issue Litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 8 de dezembro de 2016
    ...along those lines in other jurisdictions: in Garnett, 'Substance and Procedure in Private International law' (OUP), Kennedy v Wallace (2004) 213 ALR 108 (Fed Ct) in Australia is given as an example, where the court assumed the privilege was procedural despite describing it as a "substantive......
  • Corkhill v Commonwealth of Australia (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 6 de abril de 2018
    ...Ltd v Esso Australia Ltd (2003) Aust Tort Reports 81–692 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Kalis v New [2017] ACTSC 334 Kennedy v Wallace [2004] FCA 332 ; 208 ALR 424 Knight v Commonwealth [2013] ACTSC 238 Kuligowski v Metrobus [2004] HCA 34 ; 220 CLR 363 Land Securities PLC v Westminster ......
  • Kennedy v Baker
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Legal Services and Professional Regulation Internationally? Australia Abroad
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 37-3, September 2009
    • 1 de setembro de 2009
    ...Paper (2002). 55 In Australia, one issue is whether the privilege extended to communications with foreign lawyers, see Kennedy v Wallace [2004] FCA 332 (Unreported, 25 March 2004). 56 John Braithwaite, Markets in Vice, Markets in Virtue (2005). 57 Robert Lutz, Philip von Mehren, Laurel Terr......