Kent v Vessel Maria Luisa as Surrogate for Vessels Monika and Boston Bay
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 2003 |
| Neutral Citation | [2003] FCAFC 93 |
| Date | 2003 |
| Year | 2003 |
| Court | Full Federal Court (Australia) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
1 firm's commentaries
-
Significant Stamp Duty Changes Affecting Property Transactions
...provides that "duty paid on the option fee is not credited towards the duty payable when the option is exercised". 2 (2003) 130 FCR 12; [2003] FCAFC 93. 3 (2018) 263 FCR 460; [2018] FCAFC 44. 4 Ellison v Sandini Pty Ltd (2018) 263 FCR 460; [2018] FCAFC 44 at [99]. See also Chief Commissione......
1 books & journal articles
-
Broadening the Extraterritorial Reach of Australia's Cartel Prohibition: Adopting the ‘Effects’ Doctrine without the Negative Effects
...practices context in Australia in Meyer Heine Pty Ltd v China Navigation Co Ltd (1965) 115 CLR 10 ('Meyer Heine'). See also Bray (trial) (2002) 130 FCR 1, 15; Bray (FFC) (2003) 130 FCR 317, 352 (Branson J), 370 (Finkelstein J); Stuart Dutson, 'The Conflict of Laws and Statutes: The Internat......