Kesavarajah v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 1994-0927 HCA A,[1994] HCA 41 |
| Date | 1994 |
| Year | 1994 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
92 cases
-
GLJ v The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Diocese of Lismore
...148 Moubarak (2019) 100 NSWLR 218 at 238 [89] per Bell P. 149 Arthur Miller, The Crucible, act 1, scene 1. 150 [1958] VR 45. 151 (1994) 181 CLR 230 at 245 (footnotes omitted), quoted in Moubarak (2019) 100 NSWLR 218 at 240 [99] per Bell P. 152 Moubarak (2019) 100 NSWLR 218 at 241-242 [105]-......
-
Eastman v R
...does not mean that they must be allowed to be at liberty. It is not to be overlooked, as Deane and Dawson JJ pointed out in Kesavarajah v The Queen16, that the usual consequence of a finding that a person is unfit to plead is indefinite incarceration without trial. It is ordinarily in the i......
-
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Sglb
...to obtain evidence (orally or otherwise) from a person named in the applicant's notice.’ 110 (2000) 203 CLR 1 at 14–15 [24]–[27]. 111 (1994) 181 CLR 230 at 112 (1977) 66 Cr App R 156 at 158. 113 (1992) 77 CCC (3d) 551 at 564–565. 114 ‘ Decisions under Act are final (1) A privative clause d......
-
Putland v R
...to the legislature of a policy which cannot be discerned in the legislation. 24 It may be added that the decision of this Court in Kesavarajah v The Queen23 is inconsistent with a proposition that State and Territory laws cannot be picked up unless they are expressly provided for in Pt 1B. ......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Unfitness to stand trial and the indefinite detention of persons with cognitive disabilities in Australia: human rights challenges and proposals for change.
...pt 3. (35) [1958] VR 45, 48 (Smith J). (36) (1836) 7 C & P 303, 304; 173 ER 135, 135 (Alderson B). (37) Kesavarajah v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 230, 245 (Mason CJ, Toohey and Gaudron (38) Crimes Act 1900 (ACT) s 311; Criminal Code (NT) s 43J; Criminal Law Consolidation Act 1935 (SA) s 26......