King v Philcox

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeFrench CJ,Kiefel,Gageler JJ.,Keane J.,Nettle J.
Judgment Date10 June 2015
Neutral Citation[2015] HCA 19
Date10 June 2015
Docket NumberA26/2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Minister for the Environment v Sharma
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 15 March 2022
    ...v Coffey [1984] HCA 52; 155 CLR 549; Tame; Gifford v Strang Patrick Stevedoring Pty Ltd [2003] HCA 33; 214 CLR 269; and King v Philcox [2015] HCA 19; 255 CLR 304. No party argued that any provisions of the State and Territory legislation introduced following the Review of the Law of Neglige......
  • Lisa Sheehan v Bus Éireann/Irish Bus and Vincent Dower
    • Ireland
    • Court of Appeal (Ireland)
    • 4 February 2022
    ...in this area (though not, it seems, of the law of Australia: see Tame v New South Wales [2002] HCA 35 and, more recently, King v Philcox [2015] HCA 19) is also part of Irish 7 That conclusion opens no floodgates and creates no risk of “ liability in an indeterminate amount for an indetermin......
  • Edward Robert Jausnik(Plaintiff) v The Nominal Defendant
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 18 October 2016
    ...[2009] ACTSC 59 John Pfeiffer Pty Ltd v Rogerson [2000] HCA 36 ; (2000) 203 CLR 503 Johnstone v Woolmer (1977) 16 ACTR 6 King v Philcox [2015] HCA 19 ; (2015) 255 CLR 304 Leishman v Thomas (1957) 75 WN (NSW) 173 LNC Industries Ltd v BMW (Australia) Ltd [1983] HCA 31 ; (1983) 151 CLR 575 Mah......
  • Mannall v Howard (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 21 June 2019
    ...Pty Ltd [2001] HCA 44; 207 CLR 21 Insurance Australia Ltd (trading as NRMA Insurance) v Iuli [2013] ACTSC 209; 9 ACTLR 268 King v Philcox [2015] HCA 19; 255 CLR 304 Lardil, Kaiadilt, Yangkaal, Gangalidda Peoples v State of Queensland [2000] FCA 1548 Learmonth v H&A Bag Company [1944] WCR 13......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT