King v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation1986-1021 HCA A,[1986] HCA 59
Date1986
Year1986

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
50 cases
  • David Harold Eastman v DPP
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 22 August 2014
    ...of New South Wales (1986) 5 NSWLR 465 applied Justins v The Queen (2010) 79 NSWLR 544 applied Kennon v Spry (2008) 238 CLR 366 applied King v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 423 applied Lee v The Queen (2014) 308 ALR 252 applied Mallard v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 125 Marks v Beyfus (1890) 25 QBD......
  • R v Taufahema
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 21 March 2007
    ...at 138. 14R v Benz (1989) 168 CLR 110 at 113–114. 15 (2000) 203 CLR 1. 16 See, for example, Crampton v The Queen (2000) 206 CLR 161. 17 (1986) 161 CLR 423 at 18 (1986) 161 CLR 423 at 433. 19 (1948) 77 CLR 511 at 518. 20 (2000) 206 CLR 161 at 172–173 [15]–[20]. 21 Taufahema v The Queen (2006......
  • McNamara v The King
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 15 November 2023
    ...Director of Public Prosecutions v Merriman [1973] AC 584 at 591-594, 606-607; R v Darby (1982) 148 CLR 668 at 677; King v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 423 at 433-434. 41 eg Bannon v The Queen (1995) 185 CLR 1 at 13. See also Ross, “One Accused's Evidence of Another's Criminal Disposition” (2006......
  • BD(Appellant) v The Queen
    • Australia
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • 13 April 2017
    ...(2008) 235 CLR 334, IMM v The Queen (2016) 90 ALJR 529, Jacara Pty Ltd v Perpetual Trustees WA Ltd (2000) 180 ALR 569, King v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 423, Peacock v The King (1911) 13 CLR 619, Perara-Cathcart v The Queen [2017] HCA 9, Pfennig v The Queen (1995) 182 CLR 461, Purves v Inglis......
  • Get Started for Free