Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission of New South Wales
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | French CJ,Gummow,Hayne,Crennan,Kiefel,Bell JJ,Heydon J |
| Judgment Date | 03 February 2010 |
| Neutral Citation | [2010] HCA 1,2010-0203 HCA A |
| Court | High Court |
| Docket Number | Matter No S106/2009 |
| Date | 03 February 2010 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
573 cases
- CSL Australia Pty Ltd v Minister for Infrastructure and Transport
-
Edwards v Santos Ltd
...did not have power to make any order in place of the orders that had been quashed. For the reasons which led to the majority's conclusion in Kirk about the powers of the Court of Appeal, the same conclusion must be reached about the powers of this Court. 8 Because no appeal lies to this Cou......
- Terminal Perintis Sdn Bhd v Tan Ngee Hong Construction Sdn Bhd (and Another Originating Summons)
-
R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal and Others
...Burton Crawford “Reconsidering [ Cart] and the rationale for jurisdictional error” [2017] Public Law 1). Thus, in Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2010] HCA 1, the court held that an ouster clause expressed in apparently far-reaching terms was ineffective to exclude review in rel......
Request a trial to view additional results
22 firm's commentaries
-
Reviewing a BIFA adjudication decision ' Number 1 complete guide
...a BIFA adjudication decision is because of jurisdictional error. The High Court of Australia in Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission [2010] HCA 1 confirmed that jurisdictional error may arise due to "the absence of a jurisdictional fact". The Court said at The Court amplified what was sai......
-
NSW Government Bulletin - 17 June 2015
...characteristic of Supreme Court - Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 101 - Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2010] HCA 1; 228 CLR 651 referred to ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING - development control - complying development - certificate issued by accredited certifie......
-
Requirement to comply with the procedural requirements in the SOP Act
...of certiorari and set the determination aside. Secondly, in light of the High Court decision in Kirk v Industrial Relations Commission [2010] HCA 1, the decision in Brodyn Pty Ltd v Davenport (2004) 61 NSWLR 421 should not be followed in relation to an adjudication application that was not ......
-
Adjudication determinations - a new era in challenges?
...and Quality v Davenport [2004] NSWCA 394 and the decision of the High Court of Australia in Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales [2010] HCA 1 Although the generally understood view until this decision was that judicial review of adjudication determinations was available only where the......
Request a trial to view additional results
61 books & journal articles
-
Mandatory sentencing for people smuggling: issues of law and policy.
...sentences are not contrary to the Charter merely because they fetter discretion). (294) See Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales (2010) 239 CLR 531, 578-81 [91]-[100] (French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ); Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 211 CLR 476, 513-14......
-
The Constitution and the Substantive Principles of Judicial Review: The Full Scope of the Entrenched Minimum Provision of Judicial Review
...Gummow, Kirby, Hayne, Heydon and Crennan JJ) ('Bodruddaza'). 2 S157 (2003) 211 CLR 476; Kirk v Industrial Court of New South Wales (20 10) 239 CLR 531 ('Kirk'). 3 Kirk (2010) 239 CLR 531. 4 Cheryl Saunders, 'Plaintiff S157/2002: A Case-Study in Common Law Constitutionalism' (2005) 12 Austra......
-
Can Parliament Confer Plenary Executive Power? the Limitations Imposed by Sections 51 and 52 of the Australian Consitution
...124. 157 Note, the State Supreme Courts also have some entrenched judicial review jurisdiction: Kirk v Industrial Relations Court (NSW) (2010) 239 CLR 531....
-
The Nature of Merits Review: A Bold Vision Realised in the Administrative Appeals Tribunal
...192 Forge v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (12006) 228 CLR 45; Kirk v Industrial Court (NSW) (2010) 239 CLR 531, 566 [55], 581 [100]. 193 Brandy v Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1995) 183 CLR 245, 261. 194 Eastman v The Queen (2000) 203 CLR 1, 40–1 [130]. 1......
Request a trial to view additional results