Kristoffersen v Department of Employment¸ Workplace Relations and Small Business
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 2002-0826 FCA A,[2002] FCAFC 269 |
| Date | 2002 |
| Year | 2002 |
| Court | Federal Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
6 cases
- Cadence Asset Management Pty Ltd v Concept Sports Ltd
-
Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Clarke
...JJ, 18/07/97) Hamod v New South Wales (2002) 188 ALR 659 Kristoffersen v Department of Employment, Workplace Relations & Small Business [2002] FCAFC 269 Nguyen v Nguyen (1990) 169 CLR 245 Papps v Medical Board of South Australia [2006] SASC 234 Queensland v The Commonwealth (1977) 139 CLR 5......
-
Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd
...Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Pty Ltd (2000) 104 FCR 564 Kristoffersen v Department of Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business [2002] FCAFC 269 Malouf v Malouf (1999) 86 FCR 134 Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1348 Optiver Australia Pty Ltd v Tibra Trading......
-
Harding v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation
...and Multicultural Affairs (1997) 78 FCR 543 and Kristofferson v Department of Employment, Workplace Relations and Small Business [2002] FCAFC 269. There is at least one comparatively recent judgment of a single judge proceeding on probably the erroneous assumption that there is a right to e......
Get Started for Free