Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGummow J,French CJ
Judgment Date04 May 2011
Neutral Citation[2011] HCA 11,2011-0504 HCA A
Docket NumberP31/2010
CourtHigh Court
Date04 May 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
241 cases
  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 10 November 2021
    ...412–413 [165]–[167]). As Heydon, Crennan and Bell JJ succinctly observed a year earlier in Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 11; (2011) 243 CLR 361 (at 384–385 [63]–[64]):63. The rule in Jones v Dunkel is that the unexplained failure by a party to call a witness may ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 firm's commentaries
3 books & journal articles
  • Litigation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume III - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...& Co Ltd v Watield Technology Ltd [2007] HKCFI 197 at [80], per Mr Recorder Kwok SC; Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd (2011) 243 CLR 361 at [63]–[64], per Heydon, Crennan and Bell JJ; Lym International Pty Ltd v Marcolongo [2011] NSWCA 303 at [90]–[94], per Campbell JA; Indigo......
  • The Importance of Full and Frank Disclosure in Family Law Financial Proceedings and the Many Consequences of Non-Disclosure
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 45-1, March 2017
    • 1 March 2017
    ...Hannan, ‘Use of Affidavits in the Family Court’ (2012) 2 Family Law Review 72, 96–7. 136 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd (2011) 243 CLR 361, 384–5 [63]–[64] (Heydon, Crennan and Bell JJ). 137 See Bateman v Bowe [2013] FamCA 253 (19 April 2013) [22], [27]–[30] (Murphy J); Surr......
  • The influence of Professor J.H. Wigmore on evidence law in Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 19-1, January 2015
    • 1 January 2015
    ...p. 162.45. The principles are summarised most recently in the High Court of Australia in Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd [2011] HCA 11, [63]. In relation to criminal cases, in Dyers v R (2002) 210 CLR 285 Gaudron and Hayne JJ held at [9]–[10](Kirby J at [52] and Callinan J at......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT