Lamont v University of Queensland (No 2)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court
JudgeRANGIAH J
Judgment Date28 May 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCA 720
Date28 May 2020
Lamont v University of Queensland (No 2) [2020] FCA 720

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Lamont v University of Queensland (No 2) [2020] FCA 720


File number:

QUD 263 of 2018



Judge:

RANGIAH J



Date of judgment:

28 May 2020



Catchwords:

INDUSTRIAL LAW – employment – whether adverse action taken by respondents within s 342(1) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FWA) – whether adverse action taken against applicant because applicant exercised workplace rights in contravention of s 340(1) of the FWA – whether University liable under s 793 of the FWA for adverse action engaged in by officials – allegations of contraventions of s 340(1) of the FWA upheld in part – compensation awarded under s 545 of the FWA


INDUSTRIAL LAW – employment – whether University breached enterprise agreements


CONTRACT – whether University breached implied terms of contract of employment



Legislation:

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 140

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 50, 340, 340(1), 341, 342(1), 360, 361, 361(1), 545, 550, 570 and 793

Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth) s 170EE

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s 298K(1)

Crime and Misconduct Act 2001 (Qld)

Industrial Arbitration Act 1940 (NSW) s 95

University of Queensland Act 1998 (Qld) ss 2(b), 4(2)(a), 9(1) and 27(1)

Whistleblowers Protection Act 1994 (Qld) ss 11(1) and 11(2)

Workplace Health and Safety Act 2011 (Qld)



Cases cited:





Aitken v Construction, Mining, Energy, Timberyards, Sawmills and Woodworkers Union of Australia — Western Australian Branch (1995) 63 IR 1

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Hall (2018) 261 FCR 347

Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association v International Aviation Service Assistance Pty Ltd (2011) 193 FCR 526

Barker v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2012) 229 IR 249; [2012] FCA 942

Bauer Consumer Media Ltd v Evergreen Television Pty Ltd [2019] FCAFC 71

Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education v Barclay (2012) 248 CLR 500

Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336

Burazin v Blacktown City Guardian Pty Ltd (1996) 142 ALR 144

Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd (1995) 185 CLR 410

Childs v Metropolitan Transport Trust (1981) IAS Current Review 946

Cigarette & Gift Warehouse Pty Ltd v Whelan (2019) 285 IR 290; [2019] FCAFC 16

Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker (2014) 253 CLR 169

Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Finance Sector Union of Australia (2007) 157 FCR 329

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2007) 162 FCR 466

Community and Public Sector Union v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2001) 107 FCR 93

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Anglo Coal (Dawson Services) Pty Ltd (2015) 238 FCR 273

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd (2014) 253 CLR 243

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v BHP Coal Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 50

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Clermont Coal Pty Ltd (2015) 253 IR 166; [2015] FCA 1014

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Coal and Allied Operations Pty Ltd (1999) 140 IR 131; [1999] FCA 1531

Dafallah v Fair Work Commission (2014) 225 FCR 559

Ermel v Duluxgroup (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] FCA 17

Fair Work Ombudsman v Eastern Colour Pty Ltd (2011) 209 IR 263; [2011] FCA 803

Fair Work Ombudsman v South Jin Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 1456

Ferrcom Pty Ltd v Commercial Union Assurance Company of Australia Ltd (1993) 176 CLR 332

Finance Sector Union of Australia v Australian & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2002) 120 FCR 107

Foggo v O’Sullivan Partners (Advisory) Pty Ltd (2011) 206 IR 87; [2011] NSWSC 501

Gibbs v The Palmerston Town Council [1987] FCA 732

Goldman Sachs JBWere Services Pty Ltd v Nikolich (2007) 163 FCR 62

Gray v Sirtex Medical Ltd (2011) 276 ALR 267; [2011] FCAFC 40

Hammond v Department of Health (1983) 6 IR 371

Health Services Union of Australia v Tasmania (1996) 73 IR 140

Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298

Jones v Queensland Tertiary Admissions Centre Ltd (No 2) (2010) 186 FCR 22

Major v State of South Australia (1999) 140 IR 29; [1999] FCA 1684

Maritime Union of Australia v Fair Work Ombudsman (2016) 247 FCR 154

National Tertiary Education Union v Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology (2013) 234 IR 139; (2013) FCA 451

Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia (1998) 195 CLR 1

PIA Mortgage Services Pty Ltd v King [2020] FCAFC 15

Regulski v State of Victoria [2015] FCA 206

Riverwood International Pty Ltd v McCormick (2000) 177 ALR 193; [2000] FCA 889

Romero v Farstad Shipping (Indian Pacific) Pty Ltd (2014) 231 FCR 403

Shea v TRUenergy Services Pty Ltd (No 6) (2014) 314 ALR 346; [2014] FCA 271

Squires v Flight Stewards Association of Australia (1982) 2 IR 155

State of Victoria (Office of Public Prosecutions) v Grant (2014) 246 IR 441; [2014] FCAFC 184

Stefanovski v Digital Central Australia (Assets) Pty Ltd (2018) 368 ALR 607; [2018] FCAFC 31

Tame v New South Wales (2002) 211 CLR 317

Tattsbet Ltd v Morrow (2015) 233 FCR 46

Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165

United Firefighters’ Union of Australia v Metropolitan Fire and Emergency Services Board (2003) 198 ALR 466; [2003] FCA 480

Yorke v Lucas (1985) 158 CLR 661

Yousif v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2010) 193 IR 212; [2010] FCAFC 8



Date of hearing:

11–21 March, 25 and 26 July 2019



Date of last submissions:

10 October 2019 (Applicant)



Registry:

Queensland



Division:

Fair Work Division



National Practice Area:

Employment & Industrial Relations



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

748



Counsel for the Applicant:

Mr A Britt



Solicitor for the Applicant:

Susan Moriarty and Associates



Counsel for the Respondents:

Mr CJ Murdoch QC with Mr E Shorten



Counsel for the Respondents:

Minter Ellison



ORDERS


QUD 263 of 2018

BETWEEN:

JULIAN LAMONT

Applicant

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 cases
  • Fair Work Ombudsman v Foot & Thai Massage Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (No 4)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 14 October 2021
    ...v CSR Ltd (1996) 166 IR 182 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd (2011) 243 CLR 361 Lamont v University of Queensland (No 2) [2020] FCA 720 Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. v City of Swan (2010) 240 CLR 590 Leotta v Public Transport Commission (NSW) (1976) 9 ALR 437; 50 ALJR 666 Maca......
  • Flageul v WeDrive Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 15 June 2021
    ...dispute that the adverse action here was the dismissal of Mr. Flageul as C.E.O. of WeDrive. In Lamont v. University of Queensland (No 2) [2020] FCA 720, Rangiah J. relevantly observed that a mere causal nexus between the exercise of a workplace right and the taking of adverse action would n......
  • Quirk v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 17 December 2021
    ...44 Katter v Melhem [2015] NSWCA 213; 90 NSWLR 164 Kop v The Home for Incurables [1970] SASR 139 Lamont v University of Queensland (No 2) [2020] FCA 720 Lane v Australian Workers’ Union (1938) 39 CAR 322 Lasarewitch v The Australian Railways Union (1955) 82 CAR 14 Luck v Chief Executive Offi......
  • Flageul v WeDrive Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 18 November 2020
    ...6 R. 67 Hill v. Compass Ten Pty Ltd (2012) 205 F.C.R. 94 Joint v. Stephens [2008] VSCA 210 Lamont v. University of Queensland (No 2) [2020] FCA 720 Maric v. Ericsson Australia Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 452; (2020) 293 I.R. 442 McKerlie v. Western Australia (No 2) [2006] WASCA 274 Melbourne Stadium......
  • Get Started for Free