Lamshed v Lake

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation1958-0417 HCA A,[1958] HCA 14
Date1958
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
30 cases
  • New South Wales v Commonwealth
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 November 2006
    ...law provides some regime for regulating each particular aspect of the topics dealt with by the State law. Rather, as Dixon CJ put it in Lamshed v Lake373, the distinction is between a law which lays down a positive rule and a law ‘seeking rather to limit State power’. Section 109 may operat......
  • Clark King & Company Pty Ltd v Australian Wheat Board
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Breavington v Godleman
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Thomas v Mowbray and Ors
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 2 August 2007
    ...260 Bank of NSW v The Commonwealth (‘the Bank Nationalisation Case’) (1948) 76 CLR 1 at 185 per Latham CJ. 261Lamshed v Lake (1958) 99 CLR 132 at 154; cf Re Governor, Goulburn Correctional Centre; Ex parte Eastman (1999) 200 CLR 322 at 372–373 [130]–[131]; Work Choices (2006) 81 ALJR 34 at ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 books & journal articles
  • The 2017 Winterton Lecture. Sir Owen Dixon Today
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review Nbr. 43-1, January 2018
    • 1 January 2018
    ...(2015) 38 Melbourne University Law Review 873. 133 (1948) 76 CLR 1, 363; [1948] HCA 7. 134 Lamshed v Lake (1958) 99 CLR 132, 141–2; [1958] HCA 14. See, further, Aronson, Groves and Wilkes, Judicial Review of Administrative Action and Government Liability (6th ed, 2017) ¶19.40. 135 (1999) 19......
  • The Constitutional (In)Validity of Religious Vilification Laws: Implications for their Interpretation
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 34-2, June 2006
    • 1 June 2006
    ...of religion, but also the right to have no religion. 93 Porter v R; ex parte Yee (1926) 37 CLR 432, 448 (Rich J); Lamshed v Lake (1958) 99 CLR 132, 143 (Dixon CJ), 152 (Williams J), 154 (Kitto J); Teori Tau v Commonwealth (1969) 119 CLR 564, 567, 571 (Barwick CJ for the Court); State Aid Ca......
  • Territory Courts and Federal Jurisdiction
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 33-1, March 2005
    • 1 March 2005
    ...(1918) 24 CLR 365; Waters v The Commonwealth (1951) 82 CLR 188. 3 Porter v The King; Ex parte Yee (1926) 37 CLR 432. 4 Lamshed v Lake (1958) 99 CLR 132; Capital Duplicators Pty Ltd v Australian Capital Territory (1992) 177 CLR 248; Kruger v The Commonwealth (1996) 190 CLR 1; Newcrest Mining......
  • Constitutional Limits on Bills of Rights Introduced by a State or Territory
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 35-3, September 2007
    • 1 September 2007
    ...Ruhani (2005) 219 ALR 199, [119] (Gummow and Hayne JJ); Gould v Brown (1998) 193 CLR 346, 426–8 (McHugh J). 132 See, eg, Lamshed v Lake (1958) 99 CLR 132, 144–5 (Dixon CJ), discussing Australian National Airways Pty Ltd v Commonwealth (1945) 71 CLR 29. The majority in Lamshed rejected the b......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT