Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

Lamshed v Lake

Cited authorities 6 Cited in 44 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation1958-0417 HCA A,[1958] HCA 14
Date1958
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
31 cases
  • Bennett v Commonwealth of Australia
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 27 April 2007
    ...the plaintiffs argued that the nature of that additional power casts some light on the nature of the power presently in question. 30 In Lamshed v Lake23, Kitto J said: ‘Section 122 … confers on the legislative organ of the federation plenary power in respect of such areas as may be offered ......
  • Clark King & Company Pty Ltd v Australian Wheat Board
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • White v Director of Military Prosecutions
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 19 June 2007
    ...143 cf Farey v Burvett (1916) 21 CLR 433 at 441; R v Foster; Ex parte Rural Bank of NSW (1949) 79 CLR 43 at 81–82. 144Lamshed v Lake (1958) 99 CLR 132 at 154; cf Re Governor, Goulburn Correctional Centre; Ex parte Eastman (1999) 200 CLR 322 at 373–374 [131]–[132]; New South Wales v Commonwe......
  • Breavington v Godleman
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
    • Request a trial to view additional results
11 books & journal articles
  • The 2017 Winterton Lecture. Sir Owen Dixon Today
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review No. 43-1, January 2018
    • 1 January 2018
    ...(2015) 38 Melbourne University Law Review 873. 133 (1948) 76 CLR 1, 363; [1948] HCA 7. 134 Lamshed v Lake (1958) 99 CLR 132, 141–2; [1958] HCA 14. See, further, Aronson, Groves and Wilkes, Judicial Review of Administrative Action and Government Liability (6th ed, 2017) ¶19.40. 135 (1999) 19......
  • The Australian Constitution's Influence on the Common Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 31-1, March 2003
    • 1 March 2003
    ...J), 291(Gummow J); Durham Holdings Pty Ltd v New South Wales (2001) 205 CLR 399, 410 [14](Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow and Hayne JJ).252 (1958) 99 CLR 132.253 Ibid 148 (Dixon CJ). Lamshed v Lake has been described as a 'watershed' on the basis that itwas the first time the Court 'ap proached the......
  • The Legal Personality of the Commonwealth of Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 47-1, March 2019
    • 1 March 2019
    ...698 (Evatt J) (‘West’).28 Federal Law Review 47(1) 210. Burns v Ransley (1949) 79 CLR 101 (‘Burns’).211. Ibid 115.212. Lamshed v Lake (1958) 99 CLR 132, 141–2.213. Austin v Commonwealth (2003) 215 CLR 185, 302 [284] (Kirby J).214. Queensland v Commonwealth (1977) 139 CLR 585 (‘Second Territ......
  • The Constitutional (In)Validity of Religious Vilification Laws: Implications for their Interpretation
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 34-2, June 2006
    • 1 June 2006
    ...of religion, but also the right to have no religion. 93 Porter v R; ex parte Yee (1926) 37 CLR 432, 448 (Rich J); Lamshed v Lake (1958) 99 CLR 132, 143 (Dixon CJ), 152 (Williams J), 154 (Kitto J); Teori Tau v Commonwealth (1969) 119 CLR 564, 567, 571 (Barwick CJ for the Court); State Aid Ca......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT