Lane v Morrison

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeFrench CJ,Gummow J.,Hayne,Heydon,Crennan,Kiefel,Bell JJ
Judgment Date26 August 2009
Neutral Citation[2009] HCA 29,2009-0116 HCA A,2009-0826 HCA A,[2009] HCA 5
Docket NumberC3/2008
Date26 August 2009
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Conlan v Pratt (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Haskins v Commonwealth
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 10 August 2011
    ...plaintiff pay the defendant's costs. 1 French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ. On 26 August 2009, this Court declared, in Lane v Morrison 1, that the provisions of Div 3 of Pt VII of the Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 (Cth) (‘the Discipline Act’) were invalid. Those provis......
  • Jones v Chief of Navy
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Zentai v Honourable Brendan O'connor (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
10 books & journal articles
  • The Centralisation of Judicial Power within the Australian Federal System
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 42-2, June 2014
    • 1 June 2014
    ...courts, such a power is necessarily implied. ‘State courts’, on the othe r hand, ‘are an essential branch of the government of 28 (2009) 239 CLR 230, 237. See also Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally (1999) 198 CLR 511, 574 (Gummow and Hayne JJ). 29 (2001) 204 CLR 559, 570. 30 See John M Williams, T......
  • ADF Offensive Cyberspace Operations and Australian Domestic Law: Proprietary and Constitutional Implications
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 47-4, December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...(1918) 25 CLR 32.52. Australian Constitution ss 51(vi), 51(xxxii).53. Defence Act 1903 (Cth) s 8.54. Ibid s 9(1).55. Lane v Morrison (2009) 239 CLR 230; see also CPCF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection(2015) 255 CLR 514, 536–8, 541–2 (French CJ), 561–3 (Hayne and Bell JJ) for ......
  • Military Justice and Chapter III: The Constitutional Basis of Courts Martial
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 40-2, June 2012
    • 1 June 2012
    ...to the rules set out in Chapter III of the Constitution. The first view dominated the High Court's reasoning until Lane v Morrison (2009) 239 CLR 230, where the judges endorsed the second view. This article con tends that the first and second views pose insuperable difficulties w hen placed......
  • The never-ending challenge of drafting and interpreting statutes - a meditation on the career of John Finemore QC.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 36 Nbr. 1, April 2012
    • 1 April 2012
    ...203 CLR 248, 307 [176]. (43) Ibid 306-7 [174]-[175]. (44) See Military Court of Australia Bill 2012 (Cth) cl 64. See Lane v Morrison (2009) 239 CLR 230. (45) (2003) 217 CLR 521,533 (46) Cheatle v The Queen (1993) 177 CLR 541,560 (Mason CJ, Brennan, Deane, Dawson, Toohey, Gaudron and McHugh ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT