Lane v Morrison
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Judge | French CJ,Gummow J.,Hayne,Heydon,Crennan,Kiefel,Bell JJ |
Judgment Date | 26 August 2009 |
Neutral Citation | [2009] HCA 29,2009-0116 HCA A,2009-0826 HCA A,[2009] HCA 5 |
Docket Number | C3/2008 |
Court | High Court |
Date | 26 August 2009 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
- Conlan v Pratt (No 2)
-
Haskins v Commonwealth
...plaintiff pay the defendant's costs. 1 French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ. On 26 August 2009, this Court declared, in Lane v Morrison 1, that the provisions of Div 3 of Pt VII of the Defence Force Discipline Act 1982 (Cth) (‘the Discipline Act’) were invalid. Those provis......
-
Private R v Cowen
...1 at 127–128. 39 (1989) 166 CLR 518 at 540. 40 Re Tracey; Ex parte Ryan (1989) 166 CLR 518 at 544, 563–564, 570, 585; Lane v Morrison (2009) 239 CLR 230 at 251 [63], citing White v Director of Military Prosecutions (2007) 231 CLR 41 Australian Communist Party v The Commonwealth (1951) 83 CL......
- Jones v Chief of Navy
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
The Establishment of the Military Court of Australia
...and a jury, the Australian Military Court was not a court for constitutional purposes. In its decision last year in Lane v Morrison (2009) 239 CLR 230, the High Court struck down the Australian Military Court. The main reason for the decision was that the Australian Military Court was opera......
12 books & journal articles
-
The Centralisation of Judicial Power within the Australian Federal System
...courts, such a power is necessarily implied. ‘State courts’, on the othe r hand, ‘are an essential branch of the government of 28 (2009) 239 CLR 230, 237. See also Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally (1999) 198 CLR 511, 574 (Gummow and Hayne JJ). 29 (2001) 204 CLR 559, 570. 30 See John M Williams, T......
-
ADF Offensive Cyberspace Operations and Australian Domestic Law: Proprietary and Constitutional Implications
...(1918) 25 CLR 32.52. Australian Constitution ss 51(vi), 51(xxxii).53. Defence Act 1903 (Cth) s 8.54. Ibid s 9(1).55. Lane v Morrison (2009) 239 CLR 230; see also CPCF v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection(2015) 255 CLR 514, 536–8, 541–2 (French CJ), 561–3 (Hayne and Bell JJ) for ......
-
Military Justice and Chapter III: The Constitutional Basis of Courts Martial
...to the rules set out in Chapter III of the Constitution. The first view dominated the High Court's reasoning until Lane v Morrison (2009) 239 CLR 230, where the judges endorsed the second view. This article con tends that the first and second views pose insuperable difficulties w hen placed......
-
DOES LIM TRULY HAVE 'NOTHING TO SAY' ABOUT THE COMMONWEALTH'S REGIONAL PROCESSING ARRANGEMENTS? HABEAS CORPUS AS A VEHICLE FOR TESTING THE CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF OFFSHORE DETENTION.
...JJ); White v Director of Military Prosecutions (2007) 231 CLR 570, 591 [33] (Gummow, Hayne and Crennan JJ) ('White); Lane v Morrison (2009) 239 CLR 230, 236 [6] (French CJ and Gummow J), 267-8 [118] (Hayne, Heydon, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell (181) AJL20 (n 14) 574 [43] (Kiefel CJ, Gageler, Ke......
Request a trial to view additional results