Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeFrench CJ.,Kiefel J,Hayne J.,Crennan J.,Kiefel J.,Bell J.,Gageler,Keane JJ.
Judgment Date09 October 2013
Neutral Citation[2013] HCA 39
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberA1/2014
Date09 October 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
154 cases
  • PP v Gan Boon Aun
    • Malaysia
    • Federal Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • North Australian Aboriginal Justice Agency Ltd v Northern Territory
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 11 November 2015
    ...The Modern Supreme Court and Legal Change’, (2015) 128 Harvard Law Review 2109 at 2112, 2164. 95Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission (2013) 251 CLR 196 at 310 [313]–[314]; [2013] HCA 39. See also Al-Kateb v Godwin (2004) 219 CLR 562 at 577 [19]; [2004] HCA 96Project Blue Sky Inc v Austral......
  • Commonwealth of Australia v Helicopter Resources Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 24 April 2020
    ...[No 2] [2018] FCA 991 at [115], [120], citing Hammond v The Commonwealth (1982) 152 CLR 188, Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission (2013) 251 CLR 196, Lee v The Queen (2014) 253 CLR 455, X7 v Australian Crime Commission (2013) 248 CLR 92, R v OC (2015) 90 NSWLR 134, Victoria v Australian B......
  • Burgess v Commonwealth of Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 20 May 2020
    ...1 Jones v Dunkel [1959] HCA 8; (1959) 101 CLR 298 Lamb v Cotogno [1987] HCA 47; (1987) 164 CLR 1 Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission [2013] HCA 39; (2013) 251 CLR 196 Lee Bostridge v Oxleas NHS Foundation Trust [2015] EWCA Civ 79 Mediana [1900] AC 113 Minister for Immigration and Multicu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
  • Self incrimination, regulators and commissions – do I really have to answer that question? Part 2
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 22 March 2016
    ...and Energy Union (Ruling on Discovery) [2015] VSC 352. 7 X7 v Australian Crime Commission (2013) 248 CLR 92, Lee v NSW Crime Commission (2013) 251 CLR 196 and Lee v R (2014) 253 CLR 455. 8 Re Bolton: Ex parte Beane [1987] HCA 12, Coco v The Queen [1994] HCA 15 9 Opening of Law Term Address ......
  • The privilege against self-incrimination in regulatory investigations
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 20 September 2019
    ...CLR 95. 4 Reid v Howard (1995) 184 CLR 1, [15]. 5 Griffin v Pantzer (2004) 137 FCR 209, [44]. 6 Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission (2013) 251 CLR 196. 7 Environment Protection Authority v Caltex Refining Co Pty Ltd (1993) 178 CLR 477, 503 (Mason CJ and Toohey 8 Environment Protection Au......
  • NSW Government Bulletin - 12 November 2014
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 19 November 2014
    ...provisions of the Act should not be read down in the same way. His Honour also made reference to Lee (no.1) v NSW Crime Commission [2013] HCA 39 where Gageler and Keane JJ repeated that "[i]t is of little assistance, in endeavouring to work out the meaning of parts of [a legislative] scheme......
  • NSW Government Bulletin - 23 October 2013
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 25 October 2013
    ...paper has been released for community consultation. Responses are due by 25 October 2013. Cases Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission [2013] HCA 39 Appeal dismissed with Statutes - Interpretation - Recovery of proceeds of crime - Examination orders - Appellants charged with offences - New ......
13 books & journal articles
  • A Comparison and Critique of Closed Court Hearings
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 18-3, July 2014
    • 1 July 2014
    ...that is made’ (Hayne andBell JJ) (Kiefel J agreed at [157] (only five judges heard the case)); Lee vNew South Wales CrimeCommission [2013] HCA 39, Kiefel J noting that the right to a fair trial required that sufficientparticulars of an alleged offence be provided (at [190]) and that the com......
  • Indexes
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 18-4, October 2014
    • 1 October 2014
    ...vNetherlands (1989) 12EHRR 434. . 97KS vR [2010] EWCACrim 1756 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission[2013]HCA 39 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 235,246–247Lee vThe Queen (1998)195 CLR 594 . . . . . . . . 247Leeth vCommonw ealth(1992) 174 CLR455 . . 233Lord Ad......
  • A PURPOSIVE APPROACH TO INTERPRETING AUSTRALIA'S COMPLEMENTARY PROTECTION REGIME.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 43 No. 2, December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...Legality in Australia and New Zealand (Federation Press, 2017) 46, 56-7. (157) Ibid 57-8, citing Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission (2013) 251 CLR 196, 283 [231] (Kiefel J, Hayne J agreeing at 231 [58]), 310 [313]-[314] (Gageler and Keane JJ). See also North Australian Aboriginal Justic......
  • Outside the Text: Inside the use of Extrinsic Materials in Statutory Interpretation
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 42-2, June 2014
    • 1 June 2014
    ...Act 1954 (Qld) sch 1 (definition of ‘purpose’). ‘Purpose’ includes ‘policy objective’. 117 Lee v New South Wales Crime Commission [2013] HCA 39, [45] (French CJ). 118 Dworkin, above n 17, 343. See also 342–5 where Dworkin discusses the basis for a distinction to be made between different ty......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT