Lee v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [1998] HCA 60,1998-0930 HCA D |
| Year | 1998 |
| Date | 1998 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
88 cases
- Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd (No 3)
-
Al-Rawi & others v The Security Service & others
...to call their own witnesses and to cross-examine the opposing witnesses. As was said by the High Court of Australia in Lee v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 594, at para 32: "Confrontation and the opportunity for cross-examination is of central significance to the common law adversarial system of ......
-
Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No. 1)
...an opportunity to call their own witnesses and to cross-examine the opposing witnesses. As was said by the High Court of Australia in Lee v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 594, para 32: 'Confrontation and the opportunity for cross-examination is of central significance to the common law adversaria......
-
Assistant Commissioner Michael James Condon v Pompano Pty Ltd
...v The Queen (1988) 164 CLR 350 at 356; [1988] HCA 3; Western Australia v Ward (1997) 76 FCR 492 at 496–499, 508. 287 Lee v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 594 at 602 [32]; [1998] HCA 60. 288 Bass v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 334 at 359 [56]. 289 Alister v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
A Comparison and Critique of Closed Court Hearings
...[2013] HCA 29 at [97] and [124] (Hayne andBell JJ), at [160] (Kiefel J); Ratten vThe Queen (1974) 131 CLR 510 at 517 (Barwick CJ).96 (1998) 195 CLR 594 at 602.97 Cross on Evidence: Eighth Australian Edition (LexisNexis Australia: 2010) 613, citing cases such as AllenvAllen [1894] P 254 (CA)......
-
The COVID-19 Pandemic, the Courts and Online Hearings: Maintaining Open Justice, Procedural Fairness and Impartiality
...and evidence. However,where the static written word may be insufficient to ensure fairness, a hearing may be held. A62. Lee v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 594, 602 [32] (‘Confrontation and the opportunity for cross-examination is of centralsignificance to the common law adversarial system of tr......
-
HEARSAY REFORMS
...some fact narrated by the words.” Extended discussion of this “confrontation right” is beyond the scope of this article. 81(1998) 72 ALJR 1484. 82 Where a decision is made to allow hearsay in evidence, the costs saved from calling a declarant should be measured against costs incurred to the......