Lee v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [1998] HCA 60,1998-0930 HCA D |
| Year | 1998 |
| Date | 1998 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
95 cases
- Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd (No 3)
-
Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No. 1)
...call their own witnesses and to cross-examine the opposing witnesses. As was said by the High Court of Australia in Lee v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 594, para 32: 'Confrontation and the opportunity for cross-examination is of central significance to the common law adversarial system of trial.......
-
Assistant Commissioner Michael James Condon v Pompano Pty Ltd
...v The Queen (1988) 164 CLR 350 at 356; [1988] HCA 3; Western Australia v Ward (1997) 76 FCR 492 at 496–499, 508. 287 Lee v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 594 at 602 [32]; [1998] HCA 60. 288 Bass v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 334 at 359 [56]. 289 Alister v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR......
- Evans v The Queen
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
A Comparison and Critique of Closed Court Hearings
...[2013] HCA 29 at [97] and [124] (Hayne andBell JJ), at [160] (Kiefel J); Ratten vThe Queen (1974) 131 CLR 510 at 517 (Barwick CJ).96 (1998) 195 CLR 594 at 602.97 Cross on Evidence: Eighth Australian Edition (LexisNexis Australia: 2010) 613, citing cases such as AllenvAllen [1894] P 254 (CA)......
-
The COVID-19 Pandemic, the Courts and Online Hearings: Maintaining Open Justice, Procedural Fairness and Impartiality
...and evidence. However,where the static written word may be insufficient to ensure fairness, a hearing may be held. A62. Lee v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 594, 602 [32] (‘Confrontation and the opportunity for cross-examination is of centralsignificance to the common law adversarial system of tr......
-
HEARSAY REFORMS
...some fact narrated by the words.” Extended discussion of this “confrontation right” is beyond the scope of this article. 81(1998) 72 ALJR 1484. 82 Where a decision is made to allow hearsay in evidence, the costs saved from calling a declarant should be measured against costs incurred to the......