Lee v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1998] HCA 60,1998-0930 HCA D
Year1998
Date1998
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
88 cases
  • Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd v Darrell Lea Chocolate Shops Pty Ltd (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Al-Rawi & others v The Security Service & others
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 13 July 2011
    ...to call their own witnesses and to cross-examine the opposing witnesses. As was said by the High Court of Australia in Lee v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 594, at para 32: "Confrontation and the opportunity for cross-examination is of central significance to the common law adversarial system of ......
  • Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No. 1)
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 19 June 2013
    ...an opportunity to call their own witnesses and to cross-examine the opposing witnesses. As was said by the High Court of Australia in Lee v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 594, para 32: 'Confrontation and the opportunity for cross-examination is of central significance to the common law adversaria......
  • Assistant Commissioner Michael James Condon v Pompano Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 March 2013
    ...v The Queen (1988) 164 CLR 350 at 356; [1988] HCA 3; Western Australia v Ward (1997) 76 FCR 492 at 496–499, 508. 287 Lee v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 594 at 602 [32]; [1998] HCA 60. 288 Bass v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 334 at 359 [56]. 289 Alister v The Queen (1984) 154 CLR......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • A Comparison and Critique of Closed Court Hearings
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 18-3, July 2014
    • 1 July 2014
    ...[2013] HCA 29 at [97] and [124] (Hayne andBell JJ), at [160] (Kiefel J); Ratten vThe Queen (1974) 131 CLR 510 at 517 (Barwick CJ).96 (1998) 195 CLR 594 at 602.97 Cross on Evidence: Eighth Australian Edition (LexisNexis Australia: 2010) 613, citing cases such as AllenvAllen [1894] P 254 (CA)......
  • The COVID-19 Pandemic, the Courts and Online Hearings: Maintaining Open Justice, Procedural Fairness and Impartiality
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 49-2, June 2021
    • 1 June 2021
    ...and evidence. However,where the static written word may be insufficient to ensure fairness, a hearing may be held. A62. Lee v The Queen (1998) 195 CLR 594, 602 [32] (‘Confrontation and the opportunity for cross-examination is of centralsignificance to the common law adversarial system of tr......
  • HEARSAY REFORMS
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...some fact narrated by the words.” Extended discussion of this “confrontation right” is beyond the scope of this article. 81(1998) 72 ALJR 1484. 82 Where a decision is made to allow hearsay in evidence, the costs saved from calling a declarant should be measured against costs incurred to the......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT