Libke v The Queen

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ.,Kirby,Callinan JJ.,Hayne J.,Heydon J.
Judgment Date20 June 2007
Neutral Citation2007-0620 HCA A,[2007] HCA 30
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberB1/2007
Date20 June 2007
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
255 cases
  • Jones v Chief of Navy
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Channel Seven Adelaide Pty Ltd v Manock
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 13 December 2007
    ... ... See Mallard v The Queen (2005) 224 CLR 125 ... 163 cf joint reasons at [33] citing Favell (2005) 79 ALJR 1716 at 1719 [6]; 221 ALR 186 at 189 ... 210 Joint reasons at [99] ... 211 Libke ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
5 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Forensic Investigations and Miscarriages of Justice. The Rhetoric Meets The Reality Part Three
    • 15 June 2010
    ...v. R. (1987), 88 F.L.R. 104 .............................................................................. 39– 40 Libke v. he Queen, [2007] HCA 30 ......................................................................... 5, 30 Lysaght v. Police, [1965] N.Z.L.R. 405 ...............................
  • Prosecutorial Discretion and Judicial Review: An Analysis of Recent Canadian and South African Decisions
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Southern African Public Law No. 35-2, July 2020
    • 1 July 2020
    ...(HL) para 13; Randall v The Queen [2002] 1 WLR 2237 (PC) para 10; Benedetto v The Queen [2003] 1 WLR 1545 (PC) para 54; HCA: Libke v R (2007) 235 ALR 517 para 71; CC of RSA: S v Shaik 2008 (2) SA 208 (CC) para 67. 115 In S v Rozani; Rozani v DPP, WC 2009 (1) SACR 540 (C) where the above pro......
  • Reflections on prosecutorial independence and impartiality in South Africa : the recent jurisprudence of the courts
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Southern African Public Law No. 35-2, July 2020
    • 1 July 2020
    ...1 All ER 1269 (HL); Randall v The Queen [2002] 1 WLR 2237 (PC); R v Puddick (1865) 4 F & F 497; R v Banks [1916] 2 KB 621; Libke v R (2007) 235 ALR 517; Whitehorn v The Queen (1983) 152 CLR 657 (HCA); and DO v DPP [2006] IESC 12. 73 S v Van der Westhuizen 2011 (2) SACR 26 (SCA) paras 10–13.......
  • The COVID-19 Pandemic, the Courts and Online Hearings: Maintaining Open Justice, Procedural Fairness and Impartiality
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 49-2, June 2021
    • 1 June 2021
    ...[16].113. Ibid [8].114. Goldsmith v Sandilands (2002) 190 ALR 370, 371 [2] (Gleeson CJ), 377–8 [31] (McHugh J).115. Libke v The Queen (2007) 230 CLR 559, 597–605 [117]–[135] (Heydon J).116. See, eg, Supreme Court of Victoria, ‘Virtual Hearings—Tips and Tricks for Practitioners’ (Web Page, A......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT