Lipohar v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Judgment Date1999
Neutral Citation[1999] HCA 65,1999-1209 HCA B
Date1999
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
75 cases
  • John Pfeiffer Pty Ltd v Rogerson
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 21 June 2000
    ...the common law to await equivalent legislative initiatives in Australia? 145 In a recent case bearing some analogies to the present, Lipohar v The Queen197, I concluded that the Court should not elaborate a new common law rule but should leave it to the several parliaments of Australia to r......
  • Barnes v Boulton
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Lucio Robert Paciocco and Another v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 27 July 2016
    ...(1997) 189 CLR 520 at 562–566; [1997] HCA 25. 26 Lipohar v The Queen (1999) 200 CLR 485 at 509–510 [57] per Gaudron, Gummow and Hayne JJ; [1999] HCA 65; Esso Australia Resources Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1999) 201 CLR 49 at 61–62 [23] per Gleeson CJ, Gaudron and Gummow JJ; [19......
  • Bennett v United Kingdom
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results
18 books & journal articles
  • Conflicts and Choice of Law within the Australian Constitutional Context
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 31-2, June 2003
    • 1 June 2003
    ...3 November 2001 at theAustralian National University, for comments on an earlier draft of this paper.1(1988) 169 CLR 41('Breavington').2(1999) 200 CLR 485 ('Lipohar').3(2000) 203 CLR 503 ('Pfeiffer').4Brian Opeskin, 'Constitutional Dimensions of Choice of Law in Australia' (1992) 3 PublicLa......
  • Territory Courts and Federal Jurisdiction
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 33-1, March 2005
    • 1 March 2005
    ...CLR 51, 102 (Gaudron J). 57 Lange v Australian Broadcasting Commission (1997) 189 CLR 520, 556, 562–6 (the Court); Lipohar v The Queen (1999) 200 CLR 485, 500 [24] (Gleeson CJ), 505–10 [43]–[57] (Gaudron, Gummow and Hayne JJ), 551–2 [167] (Kirby J); cf [230]–[262] 574–585 (Callinan J) and t......
  • Attributes and Attribution of State Courts — Federalism and the Kable Principle
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 40-1, March 2012
    • 1 March 2012
    ...(Federation Press, 5th ed, 2010) 651–2. 69 See, eg, Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520; Lipohar v The Queen (1999) 200 CLR 485. 42 Federal Law Review Volume 40 ____________________________________________________________________________________ C Kable principle ......
  • The Development of the High Court's Willingness to Overrule Common Law Precedent
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 45-2, June 2017
    • 1 June 2017
    ...complete abolition of Privy Council appeals as a ‘watershed event’ that ‘released a Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow and Kirby JJ); Lipohar v R (1999) 200 CLR 485, 505 (Gaudron, Gummow and Hayne JJ). On the entrenchment of this notion, see Leslie Zines, ‘The Common Law in Australia: Its Nature and C......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT