Lipohar v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 1999 |
| Neutral Citation | [1999] HCA 65,1999-1209 HCA B |
| Date | 1999 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
92 cases
-
John Pfeiffer Pty Ltd v Rogerson
...the common law to await equivalent legislative initiatives in Australia? 145 In a recent case bearing some analogies to the present, Lipohar v The Queen197, I concluded that the Court should not elaborate a new common law rule but should leave it to the several parliaments of Australia to r......
- Barnes v Boulton
-
Commissioner of Taxation v Ryan
...in Ch III of the Australian Constitution. See also Northern Sandblasting Pty Ltd v Harris (1997) 188 CLR 313 at 386; Lipohar v The Queen [1999] HCA 65 at [199]. 63R v Reynhoudt (1962) 107 CLR 381 at 388; Zickar v MGH Plastic Industries Pty Ltd (1996) 187 CLR 310 at 351. 64 cf In Re Samuel [......
-
Regie Nationale Des Usines Renault Sa v Zhang
...more difficult by the circumstance that each of the terms ‘jurisdiction’ and ‘choice of law’ itself requires further analysis. In Lipohar v The Queen, Gaudron, Gummow and Hayne JJ said of ‘jurisdiction’ 4: ‘It is used in a variety of senses, some relating to geography, some to persons and p......
Request a trial to view additional results
22 books & journal articles
-
Attributes and Attribution of State Courts — Federalism and the Kable Principle
...(Federation Press, 5th ed, 2010) 651–2. 69 See, eg, Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520; Lipohar v The Queen (1999) 200 CLR 485. 42 Federal Law Review Volume 40 ____________________________________________________________________________________ C Kable principle ......
-
The Centralisation of Judicial Power within the Australian Federal System
...jurisdiction’. Inste ad, a judicial system might have been created, ‘which was neither State nor Federal but simply Australian’, 99 (1999) 200 CLR 485, 505. 100 Ibid (footnotes omitted). Gleeson CJ (at 24) and Kirby J (at 552) agreed that there is one common law in Australia. See also John ......
-
Conflicts and Choice of Law within the Australian Constitutional Context
...3 November 2001 at theAustralian National University, for comments on an earlier draft of this paper.1(1988) 169 CLR 41('Breavington').2(1999) 200 CLR 485 ('Lipohar').3(2000) 203 CLR 503 ('Pfeiffer').4Brian Opeskin, 'Constitutional Dimensions of Choice of Law in Australia' (1992) 3 PublicLa......
-
Federal Constitutional Influences on State Judicial Review
...above n 1, 294. 79 The unitary nature of the common law was confirmed in Kirk (2010) 239 CLR 531, 581 [99] citing Lipohar v The Queen (1999) 200 CLR 485, 505 [43] (Gaudron, Gummow and Hayne JJ). On close inspection the more decisive passage in Lipohar seems to be at 505–6 [45]–[46]. 80 The ......
Request a trial to view additional results