Little v Law Institute of Victoria (No 3)

JurisdictionVictoria
Year1990
Date1990
CourtSupreme Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
51 cases
  • Sagicor Ins v Crawford
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 14 February 2011
    ...1 A.C. 215; [2001] 2 W.L.R. 1311; [2001] 2 All E.R. 769; [2001] UKHL 22, applied. (26) Little v. Law Institute of Victoria (No. 3), [1990] V.R. 257, not followed. (27) Livingstone v. Rawyards Coal Co.ELR(1880), L.R. 5 App. Cas. 25, dictum of Lord Blackburn applied. (28) Lloyd v. Grace, Smit......
  • Energex Ltd v Alstom Australia Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Gold Coast City Council v Pioneer Concrete (Qld) Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Peter Willers v Albert Gubay
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 15 May 2015
    ...had some validity in Victorian times when there was little publicity before the trial: see Little v Law Institute of Victoria (No. 3) [1990] VR 257. However realistic this view may have been in its own time, it is no longer plausible. In modern times wide dissemination in the media of alleg......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Expert witness immunity (medical): Summary dismissal application.
    • United States
    • LexBlog United States
    • 8 June 2021
    ...prospect of establishing that the provision of the report was “in trade or commerce” – see: Little v Law Institute of Victoria (No 3) [1990] VR 257 at 273 (lines 33-34); Griffith at [142]; compare the factually different case of Stockland (Constructors) Pty Ltd v Retail Design Group (Intern......
  • Solicitors Engaged In 'Trade Or Commerce' - Making Sense Of The Twists And Turns In Judicial Interpretation
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 5 October 2009
    ...at 604 per Mason CJ, Deane, Dawson and Gaudron JJ. 2 (2002) 172 FLR 140 at [24] per Osborn J. 3 Little v Law Institute of Victoria (No 3) [1990] VR 257 at 273 per Kaye and Beach JJ, at 292 per Ormiston J. 4 W J Green and Co (1984) Pty Ltd v Wilden Pty Ltd (unreported, Supreme Court of WA, 2......
1 books & journal articles
  • Misfeasance in public office: a very peculiar tort.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 35 No. 1, April 2011
    • 1 April 2011
    ...by the police to cause illegal harm should have been what mattered. (116) [1959] VR 286, 293. Little v Law Institute of Victoria [No 3] [1990] VR 257, 270 (Kaye and Beach JJ) confirmed this extension of (117) S A de Smith, Judicial Review of Administrative Action (Stevens & Sons, 2nd ed......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT