Louth v Diprose
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | High Court |
| Neutral Citation | [1992] HCA 61,1992-1202 HCA A |
| Date | 1992 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
108 cases
- Mulcahy v Hydro-Electric Commission
- Nzi Capital Corporation Ltd v Fulton
- Accc v Cg Berbatis Holdings Pty Ltd
- Yang v American International Assurance Company (Australia) Ltd
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
Taking Delight in Being Contrary, Worried about Being a Loner or Simply Indifferent: How Do Judges Really Feel About Dissent?
...instances of such dissents. However, by way of example, I think it is fair to say that the dissents of Toohey J in Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 CLR 621 and Gleeson CJ and Callinan J in Bridgewater v Leahy (1998) 194 CLR 457 about the correct application of the unconscionability doctrine would......
-
Taking Delight in Being Contrary, Worried about Being a Loner or Simply Indifferent: How Do Judges Really Feel About Dissent?
...instances of such dissents. However, by way of example, I think it is fair to say that the dissents of Toohey J in Louth v Diprose (1992) 175 CLR 621 and Gleeson CJ and Callinan J in Bridgewater v Leahy (1998) 194 CLR 457 about the correct application of the unconscionability doctrine would......
-
Material exploitation and the autonomy ideal: the role of equity theory in adult protection legislation.
...[1985] 2 All E.R. 281 (C.A.). (25) See, Kovach v Beardsley, [1991] 6 WWR 113 at 120 (Alta. QB). (26) See, for example, Louth v Diprose, [1992] HCA 61. (27) Sperling Estate v Heidt (1998), 178 Sask. R. 192 (QB), aff'd. (2000), 199 Sask. R. 256 (28) See Black v Wilcox (1976), 12 OR (2d) 759 (......