Mabo v Queensland

JurisdictionQueensland
CourtHigh Court
Judgment Date1988
Neutral Citation1988-1208 HCA D,[1988] HCA 69
Year1988
Date1988

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
53 cases
  • Maloney v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • June 19, 2013
    ...(Q), s 3 of which purported to extinguish native title on all islands within a defined area in the Torres Strait. It was held in Mabo v Queensland (No 1)20 to be inconsistent with s 10(1) of the RDA , which had the effect that the Miriam People, who sought recognition of their traditional ......
  • Jango v Northern Territory
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Houston v State of New South Wales (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • June 11, 2021
    ...of Technology Sydney [2021] FCA 360 Kowalski v MMAL Staff Superannuation Fund Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 117; 178 FCR 401 Mabo v Queensland [1988] HCA 69; 166 CLR 186 Morton v Union Steamship Company of New Zealand Ltd [1951] HCA 42; 83 CLR 402 Murphy v Electoral Commissioner [2016] HCA 36; 261 C......
  • Yunupingu on behalf of the Gumatj Clan or Estate Group v Commonwealth of Australia
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • May 22, 2023
    ...and Leisure Australia Ltd v Commissioner of State Revenue (Vic) [2018] VSCA 237; 108 ATR 736 Mabo v Queensland (No 1) [1998] HCA 69; 166 CLR 186 Mabo v Queensland (No 2) [1992] HCA 23; 175 CLR 1 Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd (1971) 17 FLR 141 Minister for Primary Industry v Davey [1993] FCA 8......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Federal Court judgment commentary: Native title
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • July 31, 2023
    ...('Griffiths'). 13 Spencer v Commonwealth [1907] HCA 82 in Yunupingu (n 1) [463]. 14 Yunupingu (No 1) [462-3]. 15 Mabo v Queensland (No 1) [1988] HCA 69, and Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) s10(1) ('RDA') in Yunupingu (n 1) 16 Peter Butt, Land Law (Thomson Reuters, 6th ed, 2010) 978. 17......
12 books & journal articles
  • The Engineers Case Centenary: SCOTUS and the Origins of Australia's Scabrous Constitutional Signature
    • United Kingdom
    • British Journal of American Legal Studies No. 10-1, April 2021
    • April 1, 2021
    ...269 Id. 270 Id. 271 Id. at 127. 272 Id . 273 Queensland Coast Islands Declaratory Act 1985 (Qld) (Austl.). 274 Mabo v Queensland [No 1] (1988) 166 CLR 186 (Austl.). 275 Mabo v Queensland [No 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1 (Austl.). 276 Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) (Austl.). 277 International C......
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Property
    • August 5, 2021
    ...183 Mabo v Queensland (No 2), [1992] HCA 23, 175 CLR 1 ..............34, 58, 59, 61, 62 Mabo v Queensland, [1988] HCA 69, 166 CLR 186 ............................................ 63 MacArthur v Hastings (1905), 15 Man R 500 (QB) ................................... 253, 254 MacDonald v MacDo......
  • A hope disillusioned, an opportunity lost? Reflections on common law native title and ten years of the Native Title Act.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 27 No. 2, August 2003
    • August 1, 2003
    ...general community. The attempt by the 1985 Act to extinguish the traditional legal rights of the Miriam [sic] people therefore fails. (1988) 166 CLR 186, 218-19 (Brennan, Toohey and Gaudron JJ). Following the decision of the High Court in Ward, the possibility of invalidity was diminished a......
  • Title to Land
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Property
    • August 5, 2021
    ...Vict, c 3, reprinted in RSC 1985, App II, No 5. 105 Ibid , s 109. 106 Ibid , s 92(13). 107 Ibid , s 91(24). 108 See Mabo v Queensland , [1988] HCA 69, 166 CLR 186. THE LAW OF PROPERTY 64 (1) The existing aboriginal and treaty rights of the aboriginal peoples of Canada are hereby recognized ......
  • Get Started for Free