Mabo v State of Queensland (No2)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date03 June 1992
Neutral Citation1992-0603 HCA F,[1992] HCA 23
Date03 June 1992
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
327 cases
5 firm's commentaries
  • Federal Court judgment commentary: Native title
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 31 July 2023
    ...(2004) 28(1) Melbourne University Law Review 28 Peter Butt, Land Law (Thomson Reuters, 6th ed, 2010) B Cases Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1 Yunupingu on behalf of the Gumatj Clan or Estate Group v Commonwealth of Australia [2023] FCAFC 75 C Legislation Aboriginal Land Rights Act ......
  • Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker: High Court closes the door on the invisible trust and confidence term, but will another door then open to something more effective and visible?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 5 October 2014
    ...exactly a classic example of incremental development in the common law either. The decision of the High Court in Mabo v The Queen (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1 in fact totally rejected a long line of common law authority that Australia was "terra nullius" when the British arrived. We all coped wi......
  • Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 3
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 18 February 2020
    ...question of his status to the Federal Court.16 Footnotes 1 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (Cth) (the Constitution). 2 (1992) 175 CLR 1 ('Mabo [No 2]'); Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 3 at [71], [268], [289], [298], [350], [373], [451] ('Love v 3 Love v......
  • Migration Matters | Immigration Update May 2023
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 16 May 2023
    ...who are not Australian citizens or permanent residents, and who satisfy the tripartite test as set out in Mabo v Queensland [No. 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1, as a result of the High Court's decision in Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth (2020) 270 CLR Eligible individuals will be invited to ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
117 books & journal articles
  • Native title and the 'acquisition of property' under the Australian constitution.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 28 No. 1, April - April 2004
    • 1 April 2004
    ...people were compounded by the present-day denial of an otherwise broadly available constitutional right. (1) Mabo v Queensland [No 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1 ('Mabo [No (2) Section 51(xxxi) of the Constitution provides: The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws fo......
  • National litigation and international law: repercussions for Australia's protection of marine resources.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 33 No. 1, April 2009
    • 1 April 2009
    ...of the common law. (96) Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292, 321 (Brennan J); see also at 360 (Toohey J); Mabo v Queensland [No 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1, 42 (Brennan J). See also Cachia v Hanes (1991) 23 NSWLR 304, 313 (Kirby P); Young v Registrar, Court of Appeal [No 3] (1993) 32 NSWLR 262,......
  • A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia: The UK or Canada as a Model?
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 37-3, September 2009
    • 1 September 2009
    ...J) (arguing that the principle is firmly established). 15 See, eg, Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292; Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1, 42 (Brennan CJ). 16 See Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520 (freedom of political communication); Roach v Elector......
  • Judicial Review of Non-Statutory Executive Powers
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 31-3, September 2003
    • 1 September 2003
    ...3 [9]–[13]; see also New South Wales v Commonwealth ('Seas and Submerged Lands Case') (1975) 135 CLR 337, 388; Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1, 31–2. Further, the executive can provide the courts with statements or certificate which are treated as conclusive evidence on certain qu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT