Mabo v State of Queensland (No2)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 03 June 1992 |
| Neutral Citation | 1992-0603 HCA F,[1992] HCA 23 |
| Date | 03 June 1992 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
320 cases
- Nor Anak Nyawai v Borneo Pulp Plantation Sdn Bhd
- Alyawarr¸ Kaytetye¸ Warumungu¸ Wakay Native Title Claim Group v Northern Territory
- Commonwealth v Yarmirr
- De Rose v South Australia
Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
-
Federal Court judgment commentary: Native title
...(2004) 28(1) Melbourne University Law Review 28 Peter Butt, Land Law (Thomson Reuters, 6th ed, 2010) B Cases Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1 Yunupingu on behalf of the Gumatj Clan or Estate Group v Commonwealth of Australia [2023] FCAFC 75 C Legislation Aboriginal Land Rights Act ......
-
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker: High Court closes the door on the invisible trust and confidence term, but will another door then open to something more effective and visible?
...exactly a classic example of incremental development in the common law either. The decision of the High Court in Mabo v The Queen (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1 in fact totally rejected a long line of common law authority that Australia was "terra nullius" when the British arrived. We all coped wi......
-
Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 3
...question of his status to the Federal Court.16 Footnotes 1 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (Cth) (the Constitution). 2 (1992) 175 CLR 1 ('Mabo [No 2]'); Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 3 at [71], [268], [289], [298], [350], [373], [451] ('Love v 3 Love v......
-
Migration Matters | Immigration Update May 2023
...who are not Australian citizens or permanent residents, and who satisfy the tripartite test as set out in Mabo v Queensland [No. 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1, as a result of the High Court's decision in Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth (2020) 270 CLR Eligible individuals will be invited to ......
Request a trial to view additional results
115 books & journal articles
-
Native title and the 'acquisition of property' under the Australian constitution.
...people were compounded by the present-day denial of an otherwise broadly available constitutional right. (1) Mabo v Queensland [No 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1 ('Mabo [No (2) Section 51(xxxi) of the Constitution provides: The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws fo......
-
National litigation and international law: repercussions for Australia's protection of marine resources.
...of the common law. (96) Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292, 321 (Brennan J); see also at 360 (Toohey J); Mabo v Queensland [No 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1, 42 (Brennan J). See also Cachia v Hanes (1991) 23 NSWLR 304, 313 (Kirby P); Young v Registrar, Court of Appeal [No 3] (1993) 32 NSWLR 262,......
-
The Australian Constitution's Influence on the Common Law
...Robert Garran, The Annotated Constitution of the AustralianCommonwealth (1901, reprinted 1995) 785.12 See, eg, Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1, 15 (Mason CJ and McHugh J); Dietrich vThe Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292, 297–8 (Mason CJ and McHugh J); Environment ProtectionAuthority v Calt......
-
The legal and commercial frameworks
...in australia is limited, and generally arises for consideration in disputes over property rights: see, eg, Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLr 1. aboriginal 6 ThE LEGaL aND COMMErCIaL FraMEWOrKS to ind out what are the laws of England, Australia, Hong Kong and Singapore is that they are......
Request a trial to view additional results