Mabo v State of Queensland (No2)
| Jurisdiction | Queensland |
| Court | High Court |
| Judgment Date | 03 June 1992 |
| Neutral Citation | 1992-0603 HCA F,[1992] HCA 23 |
| Date | 03 June 1992 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
328 cases
-
Takamore v Clarke COA CA
...of customary law is inherent in the recognition of aboriginal property in cases such as Attorney-General v Ngati Apa 62 and Mabo v Queensland. 63 This is because customary law defines the content of aboriginal proprietary rights. 64 In Ngati Apa, Keith J quoted with approval Professor D P O......
-
John Hanita Paki and Others v Attorney-General of New Zealand for and on Behalf of The Crown
...v Baker [1901] AC 561 (PC) at 577. 309 Native Land Act 1909, ss 84-87. 310 Section 88. 311 Section 88(2). 312 Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1 at 313 Hospital Products Ltd v United States Surgical Corp (1984) 156 CLR 41 at 96-97. 314 Paragon Finance Plc v DB Thakerar & Co [1999]......
- Director of Forest, Sarawak v Tr Sandah ak Tabau (suing on behalf of themselves and 22 other proprietors, the occupiers, holders and the claimants of native customary rights (NCR) lands situated at Rumah Sandah and Rumah Lajang, Ulu Machan, 96700 Kanowit
- Sangka bin Chuka and Another v Pentadbir Tanah Daerah Mersing, Johor
Get Started for Free
5 firm's commentaries
-
Federal Court judgment commentary: Native title
...(2004) 28(1) Melbourne University Law Review 28 Peter Butt, Land Law (Thomson Reuters, 6th ed, 2010) B Cases Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1 Yunupingu on behalf of the Gumatj Clan or Estate Group v Commonwealth of Australia [2023] FCAFC 75 C Legislation Aboriginal Land Rights Act ......
-
Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Barker: High Court closes the door on the invisible trust and confidence term, but will another door then open to something more effective and visible?
...exactly a classic example of incremental development in the common law either. The decision of the High Court in Mabo v The Queen (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1 in fact totally rejected a long line of common law authority that Australia was "terra nullius" when the British arrived. We all coped wi......
-
Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 3
...question of his status to the Federal Court.16 Footnotes 1 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (Cth) (the Constitution). 2 (1992) 175 CLR 1 ('Mabo [No 2]'); Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 3 at [71], [268], [289], [298], [350], [373], [451] ('Love v 3 Love v......
-
Migration Matters | Immigration Update May 2023
...who are not Australian citizens or permanent residents, and who satisfy the tripartite test as set out in Mabo v Queensland [No. 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1, as a result of the High Court's decision in Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth (2020) 270 CLR Eligible individuals will be invited to ......
Get Started for Free
97 books & journal articles
-
The Development of the High Court's Willingness to Overrule Common Law Precedent
...14 Law in Context: A Socio-Legal Journal 81, 82–3. 133 (1988) 165 CLR 107. 134 Ibid 123–4 (Mason CJ and Wilson J), 172 (Toohey J). 135 (1992) 175 CLR 1. 136 Ibid 109 (Deane and Gaudron JJ). 137 Ibid 48 (Brennan J), 1 09 (Deane and Gaudron JJ), 182 (Toohey J). Mason CJ and McHugh J agreed wi......
-
Judicial Review of Non-Statutory Executive Powers
...3 [9]–[13]; see also New South Wales v Commonwealth ('Seas and Submerged Lands Case') (1975) 135 CLR 337, 388; Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1, 31–2. Further, the executive can provide the courts with statements or certificate which are treated as conclusive evidence on certain qu......
-
A Minimalist Charter of Rights for Australia: The UK or Canada as a Model?
...J) (arguing that the principle is firmly established). 15 See, eg, Dietrich v The Queen (1992) 177 CLR 292; Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1, 42 (Brennan CJ). 16 See Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520 (freedom of political communication); Roach v Elector......
-
The Engineers Case Centenary: SCOTUS and the Origins of Australia's Scabrous Constitutional Signature
...158 CLR 1 (1 July 1983) Polyukhovich v Commonwealth (“War Crimes Act Case”) (1991) 172 CLR 501 (14 August 1991) Mabo v Queensland [No 2] (1992) 175 CLR 1 (3 June 1992) The Wik Peoples v Queensland (“Pastoral Leases Case”) (1996) 187 CLR 1 (23 December 1996) Western Australia v Ward (2002) 2......
Get Started for Free