Mackenzie v Rees
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | High Court |
| Neutral Citation | [1941] HCA 21,1941-0728 HCA A |
| Date | 1941 |
| Year | 1941 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 cases
- Progressive Mailing House Pty Ltd Vtabali Pty Ltd
- Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Kavich
-
The ‘STX Mumbai’
...118 ER 922 (refd) Jennings' Trustee v King [1952] Ch 899 (refd) Le Tarte v W Side Dev 855 A 2 d 505 (N H, 2004) (refd) Mackenzie v Rees (1941) 65 CLR 1 (refd) Man Financial (S) Pte Ltd v Wong Bark Chuan David [2008] 1 SLR (R) 663; [2008] 1 SLR 663 (folld) Melanson v Dominion of Canada Gener......
- Armco (Australia) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
CLAIMS FOR INTEREST IN WINDING UP AND BANKRUPTCY
...up to the date of the receiving order: sec Ex parte Bennett(1743) 2 Atk 527; Re Savin(1872) LR 7 Ch App 760 at 764; Mackenzie v Rees(1941) 65 CLR 1 at 8 and 23. See the doubts expressed on this principle in Re Riddell Inc and AMIC Mortgage Investment Corp(1992) 89 DLR (4th) 84 at 88e—89d. 9......
-
Insolvency Law
...and to divide the wreck of the man”s property as it stood at that time (Re Savin(1872) LR 7 Ch App 760 at 764; Mackenzie v Rees(1941) 65 CLR 1 at 23). Accordingly, the claim of the bank under the guarantee should have “crystallised” into a provable debt at the date of the bankruptcy order (......