Macquarie Bank Ltd v Sixty-Fourth Throne Pty Ltd

JurisdictionVictoria
CourtSupreme Court
Year1998
Date1998

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
53 cases
  • Farah ConstructIons Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 24 May 2007
    ...So far as Say-Dee was relying on Barnes v Addy, it was certainly alleging a recognised equitable cause of action. In Macquarie Bank Ltd v Sixty-Fourth Throne Pty Ltd183 Tadgell JA (Winneke P concurring, Ashley AJA dissenting) held that a claim under Barnes v Addy was not a personal equity w......
  • United Overseas Bank Ltd v Bebe bte Mohammad
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 30 June 2005
    ...document. In the case of wilful blindness, I rely on what was stated by Tadgell JA in Macquarie Bank Ltd v Sixty-Fourth Throne Pty Ltd [1998] 3 VR 133, where it was pointed out that wilful blindness could in certain circumstances be “akin to fraud”. In my view, this was the situation in the......
  • United Overseas Bank Ltd v Bebe bte Mohammad
    • Singapore
    • Court of Appeal (Singapore)
    • 23 October 2006
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Property & Projects - What's News - 2 June 2015
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 9 June 2015
    ...not imputed to lender – Russo v Bendigo Bank Ltd [1999] VSCA 108; [1999] 3 VR 376, Macquarie Bank Ltd v Sixty Fourth Throne Pty Ltd [1998] 3 VR 133, Pyramid Building Society (in liq) v Scorpion Holdings Pty Ltd [1998] 1 VR 188, Beatty v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [1995] Vi......
3 books & journal articles
  • 'The receipt of what?': Questions concerning third party recipient liability in equity and unjust enrichment.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 31 No. 1, April 2007
    • 1 April 2007
    ...J) ('Consul'); Nicholls, above n 7, 233,235. (49) See, eg, Koorootang [1998] 3 VR 16; Macquarie Bank Ltd v Sixty-Fourth Throne Pty Ltd [1998] 3 VR 133; Doneley v Doneley [1998] 1 Qd R (50) Agip (Africa) Ltd v Jackson [1990] Ch 265, 291-2 (Millett J) ('Agip'); Evans v European Bank Ltd (2004......
  • Land Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2005, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...(at [38]): In the case of wilful blindness, I rely on what was stated by Tadgell JA in Macquarie Bank Ltd v Sixty-Fourth Throne Pty Ltd[1998] 3 VR 133, where it was pointed out that wilful blindness could in certain circumstances be ‘akin to fraud’. In my view, this was the situation in the......
  • Land Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2006, December 2006
    • 1 December 2006
    ...authorities which recognised personal equities, such as Gosper (supra para 18.21) and Macquarie Bank Ltd v Sixty-Fourth Throne Pty Ltd[1998] 3 VR 133, Chan CJ noted (at [87]) that the provisions in the 1994 LTA were not the same as those in the Australian statutes. He further noted that the......