Maelor Jones Investments (Noarlunga) Pty Ltd v Heywood-Smith
| Jurisdiction | South Australia |
| Year | 1989 |
| Date | 1989 |
| Court | Supreme Court of South Australia |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
11 cases
-
Barings Plc ((in Liquidation)) v Coopers & Lybrand (No. 7)
...interests at risk other than his own and his wife's. 1621 The paradox was explored in more detail in the Australian case of Maelor Jones v Heywood-Smith (1989) 54 SASR 285. At the time of the facts giving rise to that case, section 365 of the Australian Companies Act was in similar terms to......
-
JSI Shipping (S) Pte Ltd v Teofoongwonglcloong (A Firm)
...law. 162 The court also adverted (at [1130]) to the Australian case of Maelor Jones Investments (Noarlunga) Pty Ltd v Heywood-Smith (1989) 54 SASR 285, which considered a substantially similar provision, namely, s 365(1) of the Companies Act 1962 (Cth). Olsson J declared in that decision at......
-
Santander UK Plc v R.A. Legal Solicitors
...to Barings PLC v Cooper & Lybrand [2003] EWHC 1319 (Ch) and Re D'Jan of London Ltd [1993] BCC 646, and also to Maelor-Jones v Heywood-Smith (1989) 54 SASR 285, as suggesting that something approaching "pervasive and compelling" negligence must be shown before a trustee is cut off from r......
- Sydlow Pty Ltd (in Liquidation) v Tg Kotselas Pty Ltd Kotselas and Hamilton
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
WHO LEFT THE GATES UNLOCKED? RECONCILING THE DUTIES OF AUDITORS AND COMPANY DIRECTORS
...the CA, the Court of Appeal also cited with approval the Australian case of Maelor Jones Investments (Noarlunga) Pty Ltd v Heywood-Smith(1989) 54 SASR 285 at 294—295 (which considered s 365(1) of the Companies Act 1962 (Cth)), and also the English cases of Barings plc v Coopers & Lybrand[20......