Markarian v R
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | Gleeson CJ,Gummow,Hayne,Callinan JJ,McHugh J,Kirby J |
| Judgment Date | 18 May 2005 |
| Neutral Citation | 2005-0518 HCA A,[2005] HCA 25 |
| Court | High Court |
| Docket Number | S600/2003 |
| Date | 18 May 2005 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
1384 cases
- Vu v New South Wales Police Service
-
R v Hills, 2020 ABCA 263
...Wakeling, J.A. (“[a sentence is] not an intuitive response to unknown and unarticulated values”); Markarian v. The Queen, [2005] HCA 25, ¶ 135; 228 C.L.R. 357, 406 per Kirby, J. (“The generalised assertion by the sentencer that he or she acted on ‘instinct&#......
-
R v SLW, 2018 ABCA 235
...criminal conduct. ... Nothing is more important than the proportionality principle”) (emphasis in original) & Markarian v. The Queen, [2005] HCA 25, ¶69; 228 C.L.R. 357, 385 per McHugh J. (“The principle of proportionality is one of the fundamental principles of sentencing [12] The Quee......
-
R. v. Vigon (D.M.), (2016) 612 A.R. 292
...on Federal Sentencing Outcomes in the Guidelines Era", 76 Law & Contemp. Probs. 75, 77-80 (2013). 25. E.g., Markarian v. The Queen, [2005] HCA 25, ¶ 80; 228 C.L.R. 357, 389 ("In New South Wales there is also a statutory system of guideline judgments and standard minimum non-parole perio......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 books & journal articles
-
Mandatory sentencing for people smuggling: issues of law and policy.
...followed. (390) Geraldine Mackenzie and Nigel Stobbs, Principles of Sentencing (Federation Press, 2010) 61. (391) Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357, 372 [30]-[31] (Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Hayne and Callinan JJ). (392) See above Part IIA2(b). (393) See, eg, Ex parte Manico; Re Manico (185......
-
The Paradox of Parity in Sentencing in Australia: The Pursuit of Equal Justice That Highlights the Futility of Consistency in Sentencing
...to give theprocess of sentencing a degree of exactness which the subject matter can rarelybear’: AB v The Queen (1999) 198 CLR 111.56 (2015) 215 ALR 213.57 Makarian vR(2005) 215 ALR 213 at [39], per Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Hayne andCallinan JJ.58 Ibid.59 [2010] HCA 45.60 Ibid. at [18].61 [2011]......
-
Four Models Of Judicial Reasoning In Sentencing
...in Victoria: A Case-Study’ in Chris MV Clarkson and Rod Morgan (eds), The Politics of Sentencing Reform (Clarendon Press 1995), 63. 17[2005] HCA 25 (Austl.). 18Kate Warner, ‘Sentencing Review 2004 – 2005’ (2005) 29 Criminal Law Journal 355, 360; Geraldine Mackenzie and Nigel Stobbs, Princip......
-
OFFENDERS RISKING DEPORTATION DESERVE A SENTENCING DISCOUNT - BUT THE REDUCTION SHOULD BE PROVISIONAL.
...Paper, Singapore Academy of Law & State Courts of Singapore Sentencing Conference, 9 October 2014) 6-8. (30) Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357, 373 [37] (Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Hayne and Callinan JJ), 378 [51] (McHugh J) ('Markarian'); Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584, 611 [75] (......
Request a trial to view additional results