Marks v Commonwealth

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Judgment Date1964
Neutral Citation1964-0812 HCA A,[1964] HCA 45
Year1964
Date1964

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
26 cases
  • Re Aero Marine Consulting Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • O'day v Commonwealth
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Barratt v Howard
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of Sa Inc.
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 7 March 2002
    ...at 23–24 per Lord Kinnear, 27 per Lord Mackenzie. 56 cf (2000) 77 SASR 523 at 573–575 [203]–[206] per Bleby J; Marks v The Commonwealth (1964) 111 CLR 549 at 567–568 per Windeyer J. 57 [1984] QB 368. 58 [1984] QB 368 at 371. 59 [1986] 1 WLR 323; [1986] 1 All ER 705. 60 [1986] 1 WLR 323 at ......
  • Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
  • Of Kings and Officers — The Judicial Development of Public Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 33-2, June 2005
    • 1 June 2005
    ...autonomy and responsibility'. See also Chester, above n 5, 18–21; Greiner v ICAC (1992) 28 NSWLR 125, 159; Marks v Commonwealth (1964) 111 CLR 549, 567–8. 46 John Comyns, A Digest of the Laws of England (4th ed, 1800) vol 5, 139; Bacon, above n 36, 29–30. The sale of certain public offices ......
  • Popular Sovereignty and the Nationhood Power
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 45-3, September 2017
    • 1 September 2017
    ...Steamship Co Ltd (1920) 28 CLR 129, 146–7; R v Kirby; Ex Parte Boilermakers’ Society (1956) 94 CLR 254, 275; Marks v Commonwealth (1964) 111 CLR 549, 557–8; New South Wales v Commonwealth (1975) 135 CLR 337, 364–5; Victoria v Commonwealth (1975) 134 CLR 338, 384, 405–6; Salemi v Minister fo......
  • MINISTERS, STATUTORY AUTHORITIES AND GOVERNMENT CORPORATIONS: THE AGENCY PROBLEM IN PUBLIC SECTOR GOVERNANCE.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 45 No. 2, April 2022
    • 1 April 2022
    ...Ex parte Boilermakers' Society of Australia (1956) 94 CLR 254, 275 (Dixon CJ, McTiernan, Fullagar and Kitto JJ); Marks v Commonwealth (1964) 111 CLR 549, 557-8 (Kitto J); New South Wales v Commonwealth (1975) 135 CLR 337, 3645 (Barwick CJ); Victoria v Commonwealth (1975) 134 CLR 338, 384 (S......