Marks v Gio Australia Holdings Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court
Neutral Citation1996-0209 FCA B,1996-1121 FCA C
Year1996
Date1996

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
198 cases
2 firm's commentaries
  • Construction & Infrastructure - What's News - 20 January 2015
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 23 January 2015
    ...assessing damages - Gates v City Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 1, Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd [1998] HCA 69; (1998) 196 CLR 494, applied - Henville v Walker [2001] HCA 52; (2001) 206 CLR 459, Abigroup Contractors Pty Ltd v Sydney Catchment Authority [No 3] [2006] N......
  • Interpreting Loss or Damage Under the Trade Practices Act
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 2 September 2004
    ...principle ("CCP"): see Gates v City Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 1 and Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd (1998) 158 ALR 333. Many decisions have struggled with the difficultly and artificiality of applying these common law principles to the concept of loss and damage un......
3 books & journal articles
  • CONSUMER PROTECTION, STATUTE AND
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2016, December 2016
    • 1 December 2016
    ...20 PLR 26. 40Murphy v Overton Investments Pty Ltd(2004) 216 CLR 388 at 407, [44]. See also Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd(1998) 196 CLR 494 at 503–504, [17], per Gaudron J, 510, [38], per McHugh, Hayne and Callinan JJ, 529, [103], per Gummow J, and 549–550, [152], per Kirby J. 41Henvill......
  • Causation in Securities and Financial Product Disclosure Cases: An Analysis and Critique
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 47-3, September 2019
    • 1 September 2019
    ...v Western Australia (1992) 175 CLR 514, 525 (Mason CJ, Dawson, Gaudron andMcHugh JJ) (‘Wardley’); Marks v GIO Australia Holdings Ltd (1998) 196 CLR 494, 513 (McHugh,Hayne and Callinan JJ); I & L Securities Pty Ltd v HTW Valuers (Brisbane) Pty Ltd (2002) 210 CLR109, 126 [50], 127 [54] (Gaudr......
  • Houldsworth: an obsolete piece in the legislative puzzle.
    • Australia
    • University of Western Sydney Law Review No. 12, January 2008
    • 1 January 2008
    ...Pty Ltd (2000) 98 FCR 324, 330 (French J), 335 (Whitlam J). (130) Ibid (French J, who relied upon dicta in Marks v GIO Holdings Ltd (1988) 196 CLR 494, which judicially considered the section and failed to mention either Webb's case or Trade Practices Commission v Milreis Pty Ltd (1977) 29 ......