Matson v Attorney-General

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date28 October 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCA 1558
Date28 October 2020
CourtFederal Court
Matson v Attorney-General [2020] FCA 1558


Federal Court of Australia


Matson v Attorney-General [2020] FCA 1558

File number:

QUD 107 of 2019



Judgment of:

RANGIAH J



Date of judgment:

28 October 2020



Catchwords:

EXTRADITION – application for judicial review under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) – decision of Acting Attorney-General under s 22 of the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) – application dismissed


ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for recusal based on apprehended bias – whether a reasonable person might apprehend bias – application dismissed


PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for adjournment of hearings – consideration of interests of justice – applications dismissed


PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for discovery – applications made after close of evidence – whether discovery will facilitate the just resolution of the proceeding as quickly, inexpensively and efficiently as possible – applications dismissed


PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – applications for reopening of evidence – consideration of nature and probative value of further evidence – whether reopening is in the interests of justice – applications dismissed



Legislation:

Constitution ss 51(xix), 51(xxix), 62 and 64

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 76

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37M

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.32, 20.11, 20.13, 20.14 and 20.15

Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth)

Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) ss 39B and 78B

Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 37

Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) ss 3, 7, 11, 12, 15, 16, 19 and 22

Extradition (United States of America) Regulations 1988 (Cth) Sch 1

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Arts 2, 7, 9, 14 and 26



Cases cited:

Applicant VEAL of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 225 CLR 88

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rich (2006) 235 ALR 587; [2006] NSWSC 826

Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300

Bodruddaza v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2007) 228 CLR 651

Borkovic v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1981) 39 ALR 186

Bromby v Offenders’ Review Board (1990) 22 ALD 249

Commonwealth Minster for Justice v Adamas (2013) 253 CLR 43

Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163

Dennis v Commonwealth Bank of Australia (2019) 272 FCR 343

Dranichnikov v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2003) 73 ALD 321; [2003] HCA 26

Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337

Foster v Minister for Customs and Justice (2000) 200 CLR 442

Gambaro v Mobycom Mobile Pty Ltd (2019) 271 FCR 530

Granitgard Pty Ltd ACN 007 427 590 v Termicide Pest Control Pty Ltd ACN 093 837 337 (No 3) [2009] FCA 82

Hala v Minister for Justice (2015) 145 ALD 552; [2015] FCAFC 13

Hamod v State of New South Wales (No 11) [2008] NSWSC 967

Hands v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 267 FCR 628

Harris v Attorney-General (Cth) (1994) 52 FCR 386

Hawthorn Glen Pty Ltd (ACN 004 061 214) v Aconex Pty Ltd (ACN 091 376 091) (No 1) [2007] FCA 2010

Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 123

Inspector General in Bankruptcy v Bradshaw [2006] FCA 22

Jilani v Wilhelm (2005) 148 FCR 255

Johnson v Johnson (2000) 201 CLR 488

Kakis v Government of the Republic of Cyprus [1978] l WLR 779

Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550

Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation (1997) 189 CLR 520

Laws v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1990) 170 CLR 70

Lobban v Minister for Justice (2016) 244 FCR 76

Love v Commonwealth of Australia; Thoms v Commonwealth of Australia [2020] HCA 3

Matson (Baron) v Keenan [2016] FCA 1550

Matson v United States of America [2016] FCA 1245

Matson v United States of America (2018) 260 FCR 187

Medical Board of Queensland v Freeman [2010] QCA 093

Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend (1986) 162 CLR 24

Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs v Wong [2002] FCAFC 327

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 264 CLR 421

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW (2018) 264 CLR 541

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v WZARH (2015) 256 CLR 326

Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI (2009) 259 ALR 429; [2009] HCA 39

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Huynh (2004) 139 FCR 505

NAAP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 805

NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1

Neilson v Overseas Projects Corporation of Victoria Ltd (2005) 223 CLR 331

Re JRL; Ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342

Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs; Ex Parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1

Re Polites; Ex Parte Hoyts Corporation Pty Ltd (1991) 173 CLR 78

Rivera v Minister for Justice and Customs (2007) 160 FCR 115

Rivera v United States of America [2004] FCAFC 154

Samrein Pty Ltd v Metropolitan Water Sewerage and Drainage Board (1982) 41 ALR 467

SBAP v Refugee Review Tribunal [2002] FCA 590

SBAU v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2002) 70 ALD 72; [2002] FCA 1076

SBBS v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2002) 194 ALR 749; [2002] FCAFC 361

SGH Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2002) 210 CLR 51

Singh v Minister for Home Affairs (2019) 267 FCR 200

Smith v NSW Bar Association (1992) 176 CLR 256

Snedden v Minister for Justice (2014) 230 FCR 82

SZFDE v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2007) 232 CLR 189

SZTOR v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCA 349

The Queen v Australian Stevedoring Industry Board; Ex Parte Melbourne Stevedoring Co Pty Ltd (1953) 88 CLR 100

Thompson v The Council of the Municipality of Randwick (1950) 81 CLR 87

United Salvage Pty Ltd v Louis Dreyfus Armateurs SNC [2006] FCA 116

Urban Transport Authority of NSW v Nweiser (1992) 28 NSWLR 471

Vakauta v Kelly (1989) 167 CLR 568

Vasiljkovic v The Commonwealth of Australia (2006) 227 CLR 614

Videto v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1985) 8 FCR 167

Zanker v Kupsch [2014] SASCFC 13



Division:

General Division



Registry:

Queensland



National Practice Area:

Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights



Number of paragraphs:

488



Date of last submissions:

23 October 2020 (Applicant)

16 October 2020 (Respondent)



Date of hearing:

18 November 2019



Counsel for the Applicant:

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 cases
  • Matson v Attorney-General (Cth)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 3 mars 2021
    ...30 September 2020, judgment in Action QUD107/2019 was reserved. It was, however, delivered on 28 October 2020 (Matson v Attorney‑General [2020] FCA 1558 (Matson 2020)). The parties were given the opportunity to make further submissions in the light of Matson 2020. It will be necessary to re......
  • Matson v Attorney-General (Cth)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 29 avril 2022
    ...HCA 23 Matson v Attorney-General (Cth) [2021] FCA 161 at [218] Matson v Attorney-General (No 2) [2022] FCA 213 Matson v Attorney-General [2020] FCA 1558 Matson v Secretary, Attorney-General’s Department [2021] FCA 1027 Mohammed v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 767......
  • Matson v Attorney-General (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 10 mars 2022
    ...FCA 875 Lobban v Minister for Justice [2016] FCAFC 109 Love v Commonwealth; Thoms v Commonwealth [2020] HCA 3 Matson v Attorney-General [2020] FCA 1558 Matson v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia [2021] FCA 161 Matthews v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 146 Mentyn v We......
  • Drummond v Canberra Institute of Technology (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 23 septembre 2022
    ...Broadcasting Tribunal (1990) 170 CLR 70 Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 Matson v Attorney‑General [2020] FCA 1558 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng [2001] HCA 17; (2001) 205 CLR 507 Murphy v Doman [2003] NSWCA 249; (2003) 58 NSWLR 5......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles