Matson v Attorney-General (Cth)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 29 April 2022 |
| Neutral Citation | [2022] FCA 461 |
| Date | 29 April 2022 |
| Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
3 cases
-
Matson v Attorney-General
...v Minister for Customs and Justice (2000) 200 CLR 442 Matson v Attorney-General (Cth) [2021] FCA 161 Matson v Attorney-General (Cth) [2022] FCA 461 Matson v Attorney-General (Cth) (No 2) [2022] FCA 213 Matson v Buckingham [2022] FCA 777 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Makas......
-
Matson v The Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia
...FCA 1558 Matson v Attorney-General (Cth) [2021] FCA 161 Matson v Attorney-General (No 2) [2022] FCA 213 Matson v Attorney General (Cth) [2022] FCA 461 Matson v Attorney-General [2022] FCA 790 Matson v The Attorney-General of the Commonwealth of Australia [2022] HCATrans 117 Matson v The Att......
-
Matson v Buckingham
...ss 23, 35A Cases cited: Edwards v Santos Ltd (2011) 242 CLR 421 Matson v Attorney-General [2020] FCA 1558 Matson v Attorney-General (Cth) [2022] FCA 461 Division: General Division Registry: Queensland National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Lconcerning that surrender decis......