Maxwell v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1996-0315 HCA A,[1996] HCA 46
Year1996
Date1996
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
179 cases
  • Tran v Commonwealth
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • Magaming v The Queen
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 11 October 2013
    ...Ltd v Dilley (1969) 117 CLR 651 at 656; [1970] AC 827 at 846; Walsh v Tattersall (1996) 188 CLR 77 at 90–91; [1996] HCA 26. 12 Maxwell v The Queen (1996) 184 CLR 501; [1996] HCA 46. See also Likiardopoulos v The Queen (2012) 86 ALJR 1168 at 1171 [2]–[4]; 291 ALR 1 at 3; [2012] HCA 37; El......
  • Chief Executive Officer of Customs v Labrador Liquor Wholesale Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 5 September 2003
    ...517; Neat Holdings Pty Ltd v Karajan Holdings Pty Ltd (1992) 67 ALJR 170; 110 ALR 449. 169 Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 at 363. 170 (1996) 184 CLR 501 at 171 Cobiac v Liddy (1969) 119 CLR 257 at 271 per Windeyer J; Burgess v Boetefeur (1844) 7 Man & G 481 at 504 per Tindal CJ [ 135 ER 193......
  • Island Maritime Ltd v Filipowski, Kulkarni v Filipowski
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 15 June 2006
    ...563 at 575–576. 102Barton v The Queen (1980) 147 CLR 75 at 94–95; R v Apostilides (1984) 154 CLR 563 at 571–575; Maxwell v The Queen (1996) 184 CLR 501 at 534, see also 513–514; DPP (SA) v B (1998) 194 CLR 566 at 579–580 [21]; Dyers v The Queen (2002) 210 CLR 285 at 317 [88]; Mallard v The ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Can I change my Guilty plea to Not Guilty in NSW courts?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 18 September 2022
    ...1995, unrep the plea is not unequivocal or is made in circumstances suggesting it is not a true admission of guilt(Maxwell v The Queen (1996) 184 CLR 501 at 511; [1996] HCA 46 The person who entered the plea was not in possession of all of the facts and did not entertain a genuine conscious......
1 books & journal articles