Mcbain v Victoria

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date2000
Neutral Citation2000-0728 FCA E
Year2000
Date2000
CourtFederal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • Re McBain
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 18 Abril 2002
    ...Court in relation to the judgment of the Honourable Justice Sundberg of the Federal Court of Australia inMcBain v State of Victoria (2000) 99 FCR 116. The grant of the fiat is limited to an application for relief on the basis that the [Commonwealth Act] does not, as a matter of construction......
  • AB v Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 29 Agosto 2007
    ...Goodwin v The United Kingdom [2002] ECHR 588 discussed I v The United Kingdom [2002] ECHR 592 cited McBain v State of Victoria (2000) 99 FCR 116 referred to Pearce v South Australian Health Commission (1996) 66 SASR 486 cited Re McBain; ex parte Australian Catholic Bishops Conference (2002)......
  • Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • Invalid date
  • AB v Registrar of Births, Deaths and Marriages
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 29 Agosto 2007
    ...v. South Australian Health Commission (1996) 66 SASR 486: see 490 per Williams J, with whom Bollen and Millhouse JJ agreed. In McBain 99 FCR 116, Sundberg J held that s 8 of the Infertility Treatment Act 1995 (Vic), which prevented a single woman from receiving IVF treatment, was inoperativ......
7 books & journal articles
  • Human Rights Protection in Australia: Interpretation Provisions and Parliamentary Supremacy
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 32-1, March 2004
    • 1 Marzo 2004
    ...against same-sex couples was held to be inconsistent with the Sex Discrimination Act in different circumstances: see McBain v Victoria (2000) 99 FCR 116 (Sundberg J). The High Court upheld the decision but did not consider the question of inconsistency: Re McBain; Ex parte Catholic Bishops ......
  • Human Rights Protection in Australia: Interpretation Provisions and Parliamentary Supremacy
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 32-1, March 2004
    • 1 Marzo 2004
    ...against same-sex couples was held to be inconsistent with the Sex Discrimination Act in different circumstances: see McBain v Victoria (2000) 99 FCR 116 (Sundberg J). The High Court upheld the decision but did not consider the question of inconsistency: Re McBain; Ex parte Catholic Bishops ......
  • Recognition of Lesbian and Gay Families in Australian Law — Part One: Couples∞
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 34-1, March 2006
    • 1 Marzo 2006
    ...concerning same-sex relationships. While one _____________________________________________________________________________________ 9 (2000) 99 FCR 116 ('McBain'); Re McBain; Ex parte Australian Catholic Bishops Conference (2002) 209 CLR 372. See Kristen Walker, '1950s Family Values vs Human......
  • Rights, personal rights and freedoms: the nature of the freedom of political communication.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 25 No. 2, August 2001
    • 1 Agosto 2001
    ...Torres Strait Islander Children from Their Families (1997). (64) The government acted in response to the decision in McBain v Victoria (2000) 99 FCR 116, where the Court found that the requirement of s 8(1) of the Infertility Treatment Act 1995 (Vic) that a recipient of infertility treatmen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT