McCallum, in the Matter of Re Holdco Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (No 2)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court
Judgment Date21 April 2021
Neutral Citation[2021] FCA 377
Date21 April 2021


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


McCallum, in the Matter of Re Holdco Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) (No 2) [2021] FCA 377

File number:

VID 285 of 2020



Judgment of:

O'BRYAN J



Date of judgment:

21 April 2021



Catchwords:

BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – where administrators have disposed of property used or in the possession of companies under administration by way of sale pursuant to orders of the Court made under s 44C(2)(c) of the Corporations Act 2010 (Cth) – where the proceeds of sale have been retained to meet the claims of persons who assert ownership or security interests in the property sold – where the administrators claim their costs out of the retained proceeds of sale – where a number of interested parties have made claims to ownership or security interests in the property sold – determination of the relative value of the property sold by administrators – consideration of different valuation methodologies proposed by expert valuers – proper approach to valuation – whether unaccepted offers to purchase an asset are admissible as direct evidence of market value of that asset


INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY – whether works done pursuant to technology and marketing services agreements created copyright works – whether the copyright works were sold as part of the property used or in the possession of companies under administration so as to generate some of the sale proceeds – whether relevant services agreements contained a retention of title clause which was a security interest within the meaning of section 12 of the Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) – whether ownership of copyright works, the subject of the retention of title clause, vested in grantor of the interest


EQUITY – whether a vendor’s equitable lien arose under a share purchase agreement which provided for the payment of an initial purchase price and the remainder of the purchase price was deferred to a later date – where the share purchase agreement was subsequently varied – whether variations to the share purchase agreement evince an intention to exclude, abandon or waive the lien




Legislation:

Copyright Act 1958 (Cth) ss 10, 32(2), 35(2), 35(6), 36(1), 47AB, 196, 197

Corporations Act 2010 (Cth) ss 429(2), 442C, 436A, 436C, 446A, 447A, 513C, 556(1), 1305

Corporations Act 2010 (Cth) Schedule 2 (Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations) para 60-10(1)(c)

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 59, 69

Goods Act 1958 (Vic) s 6

Personal Property Securities Act 2009 (Cth) ss 3, 12, 19(5), 21, 267

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 40.02(b)



Cases cited:

674921 BC Ltd v Advanced Wing Technologies Corp (2006) 9 PPSA (d) 43; 263 DLR (4th) 290

Albert Life Assurance Co, Ex parte Western Life Assurance Society (1870) LR 11 Eq 164

Aluminium Industrie Vaassen BV v Romalpa Aluminium Ltd [1976] 1 WLR 676

Armour v Thyssen Edelstahlwerke AG [1991] 2 AC 339

Auxil Pty Ltd v Terranova [2009] WASCA 163; 260 ALR 164

Baiyai Pty Ltd v Guy [2009] NSWCA 65

Barclays Bank v Estates & Commercial Ltd [1997] 1 WLR 415

Barker v Cox (1876) 4 Ch D 464

Beale v Trinkler [2008] NSWSC 347

Benzlaw & Associates Pty Ltd v Medi-Aid Centre Foundation Ltd [2007] QSC 233

BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v Shire of Hastings (1994) 180 CLR 266

Caruana v Port Macquarie-Hastings Council [2007] NSWLEC 109; 210 LGERA 1

Commonwealth of Australia v Amann Aviation Pty Ltd (1991) 174 CLR 64

Cordelia Holdings Pty Ltd v Newkey Investments Pty Ltd [2004] FCAFC 48

Crawley v Short [2009] NSWCA 410; 262 ALR 654

Dura (Australia) Constructions Pty Ltd v Hue Boutique Living Pty Ltd (2014) 49 VR 86

Elderly Citizens Homes of SA Inc v Balnaves (1998) 72 SASR 210

ET-China.com International Holdings v Cheung [2019] NSWSC 1874; 142 ACSR 121

Evans v McLean (No 2) [1987] WAR 110; (1985) 9 ACLR 796

Goold v Commonwealth (1993) 42 FCR 51

Hannam v Lamney (1926) 43 WN (NSW) 68

Hewett v Court (1983) 149 CLR 639

Jafari v 23 Developments Pty Ltd [2018] VSC 404

Langen & Wind Ltd v Bell [1972] Ch 685

Mackreth v Symmons (1808) 33 ER 778

McCallum, in the Matter of Re Holdco Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) [2020] FCA 666; 145 ACSR 243

McDonald v Federal Commissioner of Land Tax (1915) 20 CLR 231

MMAL Rentals Pty Ltd v Bruning (2004) 63 NSWLR 167

Re Maiden Civil (P&E) Pty Ltd; Albarran v Queensland Excavation Services Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 852; 277 FLR 337

Reliance Finance Corporation Pty Ltd v Heid [1982] 1 NSWLR 466

Rodney Jane Racing Pty Ltd v Monster Energy Company [2019] FCA 923; 370 ALR 140

State Government Insurance Office (Qld) v Rees (1979) 144 CLR 549

Wossidlo v Catt (1934) 52 CLR 301



Division:

General Division



Registry:

Victoria



National Practice Area:

Commercial and Corporations



Sub-area:

General and Personal Insolvency



Number of paragraphs:

325



Date of hearing:

27-29 January; 1, 4 February 2021



Counsel for the Plaintiff:

D F McAloon



Solicitor for the Plaintiff:

Gilbert + Tobin



Counsel for the First Interested Party:

J Slattery QC with L Currie



Solicitor for the First Interested Party:

Clayton Utz



Counsel for the Second and Third Interested Parties:

H N G Austin QC with A C Roe



Solicitor for the Second and Third Interested Parties:

Ashurst



Counsel for the Fourth Interested Party:

O Bigos QC



Solicitor for the Fourth Interested Party:

Minter Ellison



Counsel for the Fifth and Sixth Interested Parties:

P Crutchfield QC with B McLachlan



Solicitor for the Fifth and Sixth Interested Parties:

Arnold Bloch Leibler




ORDERS


VID 285 of 2020

IN THE MATTER OF RE HOLDCO PTY LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 612 592 471), RSE HOLDCO PTY LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 612 586 893), SARGON CT HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 628 621 321), SC INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS 2 PTY LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 630 632 343), SARGON SUPERANNUATION HOLDINGS PTY LTD (ADMINISTRATORS APPOINTED) (ACN 630 648 225),...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 cases