Mcdonald v South Australia

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court
Neutral Citation2011-0331 FCA C
Date2011
Year2011

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 cases
  • Batterham v Clayton Utz Partnership
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 7 April 2022
    ...Fund v Nauer (No. 3) [2017] NSWSC 1783 Marcel Andre Nauer v Peter James Batterham [2020] NSWSC 240 McDonald v State of South Australia [2011] FCA 297 Moss v Eaglestone (2011) 83 NSWLR 476; [2011] NSWCA 404 Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2015] FCAFC 50; (2015) 236 FC......
  • Patial v Kailash Lawyers Pty Ltd trading as Kailash Lawyers and Consultants
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 9 June 2022
    ...People [2019] FCAFC 177; (2019) 273 FCR 350 Kitoko v University of Technology Sydney [2021] FCA 360 McDonald v State of South Australia [2011] FCA 297; (2011) 126 ALD 488 PNJ v The Queen [2009] HCA 6; (2009) 83 ALJR 384 Prateek Patial v Kailash Lawyers Pty Ltd T/A Kailash Lawyers and Consul......
  • McNamara (Barngarla Southern Eyre Peninsula Native Title Claim) v State of South Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 24 December 2020
    ...FCR 521 Fortescue Metals Group v Warrie (2019) 273 FCR 350 Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1 McDonald v State of South Australia [2011] FCA 297 Spalla v St George Motor Finance Ltd (ACN 007 656 555) (No 6) [2004] FCA 1699 State Bank of New South Wales Ltd v Stenhouse Ltd (1997) Aust......
  • Croft on behalf of the Barngarla Native Title Claim Group v State of South Australia (Port Augusta Proceeding)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 25 June 2020
    ...191 FCR 521 Lake Torrens Overlap Proceedings (No 3) [2016] FCA 899 Mabo v Queensland (No 2) (1992) 175 CLR 1 McDonald v South Australia [2011] FCA 297 Members of the Yorta Yorta Aboriginal Community v Victoria (2002) 214 CLR 422 Onus v Alcoa of Australia Limited (1981) 149 CLR 27 Shop Distr......
  • Get Started for Free