McGregor v Stokes
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Year | 1952 |
| Date | 1952 |
| Court | Unspecified Court (Australia) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
5 cases
- Pollitt v R
-
Oei Hengky Wiryo v Hksar
...activity carried on at the premises: see Davidson v. Quirke (1923) 42 NZLR 552; Lenthall v. Mitchell [1933] SASR 231; McGregor v. Stokes [1952] VLR 347; Marshall v. Watt, Struthers, and County [1953] Tas SR 1; Gorman v. Newton; ex parte Newton [1958] Qd R 169, Police v. Machirus [1977] 1 NZ......
-
R. v. Blastland
...made. A telephone call is a composite act, made up of manual operations together with the utterance of words (cf. McGregor v. Stokes , [1952] V.L.R. 347, and remarks of Salmond, J., therein quoted). To confine the evidence to the first would be to deprive the act of most of its significance......
-
The Queen v Ng Kin Yee
...place this for me”. In my judgment, I followed HO Sheung-yin v. The Queen (supra) and three New Zealand cases, viz., McGregor v. Stokes [1952] VLR 347, Murtagh v. Paltos [1974] VR 768, and Police v. Machirus [1977] 1 NZLR 288. I also quoted at some length Ratten v. The Queen [1972] AC 378 (......
Get Started for Free