Mcguinness v Attorney-General (Victoria)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [1940] HCA 6,1940-0403 HCA A |
| Date | 1940 |
| Year | 1940 |
| Court | High Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
59 cases
- Victoria v Australian Building Construction Employees' and Builders Labourers' Federation
- Watson v Commissioner of Taxation
-
Burke v Central Independent Television Plc
...that such limitation would not prejudice the plaintiff in the presentation of his case. McGuinness v. Attorney General of VictoriaUNK (1940) 63 C.L.R. 73 considered. 5. That in the instant case such a rule of practice had no application as this was not a case of a defendant seeking to limit......
-
Goodman International v Hamilton
...Building Construction Employees' and Building Labourers' Federation (1982) 152 C.L.R. 25 and McGuinness v. Attorney General of Victoria(1940) 63 C.L.R. 73 approved. 6. That there was no rule of law which required the Tribunal of Inquiry to apply the rules of evidence applicable in a court o......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ROYAL PREROGATIVE AND STATUTE IN AUSTRALIA.
...v Colonial Combing, Spinning and Weaving Co Ltd (1922) 31 CLR 421, 433-4 (Isaacs J) ('Wooltops Case'). (17) McGuinness v A-G (Vic) (1940) 63 CLR 73, 83 (Latham CJ), 91 (Starke J), 98-9 (Dixon J), cited in Tampa Case (n 5) 501 [31] (Black (18) Case of Proclamations (1610) 12 Co Rep 74; 77 ER......
-
Protection Against Judicially Compelled Disclosure of the Identity of News Gatherers' Confidential Sources in Common Law Jurisdictions
...773 (CA); AG vMullholland [1963] 2 QB 477(CA);AttorneyGeneralvJack Lundin (1982)75 Cr App R 90; McGuinnessvAttorney-GeneralofVictoria(1940) 63 CLR 73(HCt Aust).Thi s position is also accepted as the commonlaw in Hong Kong;see Shum vEastweekPublisherLimited,n 61above.71 British Steel n 5 abo......