McKenzie v South Australia

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Year2005
Date2005
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 cases
  • Smirke on behalf of the Jurruru People v State of Western Australia (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 16 September 2021
    ...the State of New South Wales [2002] FCA 1517 Mabo v Queensland (No 2) [1992] HCA 23; 175 CLR 1 McKenzie v South Australia [2005] FCA 22; 214 ALR 214 Miller v State of South Australia (Far West Coast Sea Claim) (No 2) [2018] FCA 599 Moses v Western Australia [2007] FCAFC 78; 160 FCR 148 Murr......
  • Mann on behalf of the Bigambul People #2 v State of Queensland
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 11 May 2023
    ...FCA 1517 Lawson on behalf of the Badimaya Barna Guda People v State of Western Australia [2020] FCA 104 McKenzie v South Australia (2005) 214 ALR 214; [2005] FCA 22 Melville on behalf of the Pitta Pitta People v State of Queensland [2022] FCA 387 Miller v State of South Australia (Far West ......
  • Kokatha People v State of South Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 16 July 2007
    ...Australia v Ward (2000) 99 FCR 316 disapproved Moses v State of Western Australia [2007] FCAFC 78 considered McKenzie v South Australia (2005) 214 ALR 214 Kokatha Native Title Claim v South Australia (2005) 143 FCR 544approved Akiba v Queensland (No 2) (2006) 154 FCR 513 considered Munn v S......
  • Reid v State of South Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 21 September 2007
    ...Western Australia [2003] FCA 774cited Risk v National Native Title Tribunal [2000] FCA 1589 cited McKenzie v State of South Australia (2005) 214 ALR 214 Bodney v Bropho (2004) 140 FCR 77cited Briggs v Minister for Lands for the State of New South Wales (2004) 209 ALR 75 cited Bolton v State......
  • Get Started for Free