Le Mesurier v Connor

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1929] HCA 41,1929-1210 HCA A
Date1929
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
58 cases
9 books & journal articles
  • Arbitrate this! Enforcing foreign arbitral awards and chapter III of the Constitution.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 34 No. 2, August 2010
    • August 1, 2010
    ...Law (Law Book, 3rd ed, 1991) 185, 192. (224) Alexander's Case (1918) 25 CLR 434,441 (Griffith CJ). (225) See, eg, Le Mesurier v Connor (1929) 42 CLR 481, 519-20 (Isaacs J); Harris v Caladine (1991) 172 CLR 84, 145 (Gaudron (226) Wheeler, The Separation of Federal Judicial Power, above n 87,......
  • Attributes and Attribution of State Courts — Federalism and the Kable Principle
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 40-1, March 2012
    • March 1, 2012
    ...(s 77(iii)). 26 R v Murray and Cormie; Ex parte Commonwealth (1916) 22 CLR 437, 452 (Isaacs J), quoted in Le Mesurier v Connor (1929) 42 CLR 481, 495 (Knox CJ, Rich and Dixon JJ), and in Forge (2006) 228 CLR 45, 67 [39] (Gleeson CJ). But see Kable (1996) 189 CLR 51, 100 (Gaudron J). 27 Cher......
  • The Centralisation of Judicial Power within the Australian Federal System
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 42-2, June 2014
    • June 1, 2014
    ...Ryan (1989) 166 CLR 518, 575 (Brennan and Toohey JJ); see also at 547 (Mason CJ, Wilson and Dawson JJ). 33 (1916) 22 CLR 437, 452. 34 (1929) 42 CLR 481, 495. 35 R v Kirby; Ex parte Boilermakers’ Society of Australia (1956) 94 CLR 254, 268. 36 See John A La Nauze, The Making of the Australia......
  • Constitutional Limits on Bills of Rights Introduced by a State or Territory
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 35-3, September 2007
    • September 1, 2007
    ...J) ('Mewett'). 14 Kable (1996) 189 CLR 51, 68 (Brennan CJ), 96 (Toohey J), 101–2 (Gaudron J), 110 (McHugh J); Le Mesurier v Connor (1929) 42 CLR 481, 495–8 (Knox CJ, Rich and Dixon JJ); Federated Sawmill, Timberyard and General Woodworkers' Employes' Association (Adelaide Branch) v Alexande......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT