Meth v Norbert Steinhardt and Son Ltd (no 1)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1961] HCA 33
Year1961
Date1961
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
6 cases
  • Lucasfilm Ltd v Ainsworth
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 27 July 2011
    ...are purely territorial and do not, by United Kingdom law, confer any rights abroad: see, eg Norbert Steinhardt & Son Ltd v Meth (1960) 105 CLR 440. 79 But the rule in Phillips v Eyre was first eroded by case-law and then abolished by statute. Following the lead of Lord Wilberforce and L......
  • Zhu v Treasurer of the State of New South Wales
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 17 November 2004
    ... ... 28 See [109], [167]–[168] ... 29 See footnote 9 above ... 30 Norbert Steinhardt and Son Ltd v Meth (1961) 105 CLR 440 at 443–444 per Fullagar J (revd on other ... ...
  • Commonwealth of Australia v Yarmirr
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 11 October 2001
    ... ... Potter v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd (1906) 3 CLR 479 at 496–497 per Griffith CJ; Norbert Steinhardt and Son Ltd v Meth (1961) 105 CLR 440 ; Potter v Broken Hill Proprietary Co Ltd ... ...
  • Gallo Africa Ltd and Others v Sting Music (Pty) Ltd and Others
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...to Welgemoed and Another, NNO v The Master and Another 1976 (1) SA 513 (T): referred to. Australia Norbert Steinhardt & Son Ltd v Meth [1961] HCA 33: referred to D Potter v Broken Hill Pty Company Ltd [1906] HCA 88: referred Canada Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canad......
  • Get Started for Free