Michael Aaron Le Clair(First Appellant) v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | Australian Capital Territory |
| Judge | Murrell CJ,Mossop,Collier JJ |
| Judgment Date | 11 May 2017 |
| Court | Court of Appeal of ACT |
| Date | 11 May 2017 |
| Docket Number | File Number(s): ACTCA 20 of 2016; ACTCA 22 of 2016 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
R v Salcedo; R v Stretton (No 3)
...cases, including Singh v The Queen [2017] ACTCA 17 at [74], Rubino v The Queen [2015] ACTCA 22 at [26]–[27] and Le Clair v The Queen [2017] ACTCA 19 at [48] ( Le Clair). 84 The principles in relation to parity in sentencing co-offenders are well known. Unjustifiable disparity is an infringe......
-
Nchouki v The Queen
...; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; 242 CLR 520 Kapkidis v The Queen [2013] VSCA 35 Le Clair v The Queen ; Achanfuo-Yeboah v The Queen [2017] ACTCA 19 Locke v R [2010] NSWCCA 296 Luu v The Queen [2008] NSWCCA 285 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25 ; 228 CLR 357 McKellar v R [2010] NSWCCA 29......
-
R v Lockwood
...cases, including Singh v The Queen [2017] ACTCA 17 at [74], Rubino v The Queen [2015] ACTCA 22 at [26]–[27] and Le Clair v The Queen [2017] ACTCA 19 at [48] (Le Clair). 41 The principles in relation to parity in sentencing co-offenders are well known. Unjustifiable disparity is an infringem......
-
Fischetti v The Queen
...v The Queen [2018] NSWCCA 2 IMM v The Queen [2016] HCA 14; 257 CLR 300 Khoo v R [2013] NSWCCA 323; 237 A Crim R 221 Le Clair v The Queen [2017] ACTCA 19 Lowndes v The Queen [1999] HCA 29; 195 CLR 665 Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Medich (No 6) v R [2016] NSWSC 1001 Monfri......
Request a trial to view additional results