Milk Board (Nsw) v Metropolitan Cream Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1939] HCA 28,1939-0725 HCA B
Year1939
Date1939
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
18 cases
2 books & journal articles
  • Some Australian reflections on Roncarelli v. Duplessis.
    • Canada
    • McGill Law Journal Vol. 55 No. 3, September 2010
    • 1 September 2010
    ...See e.g. Home Benefits Pty. Ltd. v. Crafter, [1939] HCA 12, 61 C.L.R. 701 at 731-32; Milk Board (N.S.W.) v. Metropolitan Cream Pty. Ltd., [1939] HCA 28, 62 C.L.R. 116 at (25) North Eastern Dairy Co. Ltd. v. Dairy Industry Authority (N.S.W.), [1975] HCA 45, 134 C.L.R. 559 at 615, 7 A.L.R. 43......
  • RESTRAINT AND RADICALISM: SIR JOHN LATHAM'S CONSTITUTIONAL EXCEPTIONALISM.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 45 No. 1, August 2021
    • 1 August 2021
    ...of Australia: Second Session' (1951) 25(5) Australian Law Journal 245, 246 ('Law Council Convention Address'). (146) Ibid. (147) (1939) 62 CLR 116, 125 ('Milk (148) Ibid. (149) See, eg, ibid 132-3 (Latham CJ). (150) See, eg, Gageler, 'The Section 92 Revolution' (n 139) 28. (151) 'Retirement......