Miller v Miller

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeFrench CJ,Gummow,Hayne,Crennan JJ
Judgment Date07 April 2011
Neutral Citation[2011] HCA 9,[2011] HCA 92,2011-0407 HCA A
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberP25/2010
Date07 April 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
52 cases
3 firm's commentaries
  • Criminal acts and civil liabilities: where does one stop and the other begin?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 4 July 2011
    ...v Miller [2011] HCA 9 A passenger involved in stealing a car was found to be owed a duty of care after the driver lost control of the vehicle and crashed into a The 16 year old plaintiff had been out drinking with her sister and cousins. After discovering the last train had gone and she had......
  • A duty of care can arise between joint participants in an illegal enterprise
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 19 May 2011
    ...v Miller [2011] HCA 9 The High Court has found that (pursuant to s8 of The Criminal Code (WA)) a participant in a joint illegal enterprise can be owed a duty of care if, prior to the accident, they withdrew from the illegal enterprise. The fact that a plaintiff was involved in a joint illeg......
  • Can A Thief Sue The Reckless Driver Of The Get-Away Car?
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 21 June 2013
    ...and uncle were engaged in a crime punishable by a prison term of up to 7 years, not some minor traffic offence. See also Miller v Miller, [2011] HCA 9. http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2013/546.html http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/HCA/2011/9.html About The content of this arti......
6 books & journal articles
  • Contract formation
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume I - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...410 at 413–414, per Gibbs ACJ; Fitzgerald v FJ Leonhardt Pty Ltd (1997) 189 CLR 215 at 218–219, per Dawson and Toohey JJ; Miller v Miller [2011] HCA 9 at [24]; Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Haxton [2012] HCA 7 at [23]. 118 ContraCt ForMation 2.167 he question of whether a statute renders a contract u......
  • Attributes and Attribution of State Courts — Federalism and the Kable Principle
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 40-1, March 2012
    • 1 March 2012
    ...Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597, 613 [46] (Gaudron and Gummow JJ), 643 [144]–[145] (Hayne J). 112 Miller v Miller (2011) 242 CLR 446, 469 [60] (French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ). 2012 Attributes and Attribution of State Courts 47 ____________________......
  • Lecture - ONES DAY PROFESSORSHIP OF COMMERCIAL LAW LECTURE 2019 – “THE STATE OF ILLEGALITY”
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2019, December 2019
    • 1 December 2019
    ...the claimant was a partner in the firm of solicitors. 36 Nelson v Nelson (1995) 184 CLR 538. 37 [2012] HCA 7. See also Miller v Miller [2011] HCA 9; (2011) 242 CLR 446. 38 Cross v Kirby [2000] EWCA Civ 426 at [76], per Beldam LJ. 39 [2014] UKSC 55; [2015] AC 430 at [22], per Lord Sumption. ......
  • Heresy in the High Court? Federalism as a Constraint on Commonwealth Power
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 41-1, March 2013
    • 1 March 2013
    ...Commitment to a Federal Relationship Possible?' (2008) 31 University of New South Wales Law Journal 395. 34 See, eg, Miller v Miller (2011) 242 CLR 446, 454 [13], 468–469 [59]–[60] (French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ); Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Haxton (2012) 86 ALJR 296, 320 [9......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT