Miller v Miller

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeFrench CJ,Gummow,Hayne,Crennan JJ
Judgment Date07 April 2011
Neutral Citation[2011] HCA 9,[2011] HCA 92,2011-0407 HCA A
Docket NumberP25/2010
Date07 April 2011
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
40 cases
2 firm's commentaries
  • Criminal acts and civil liabilities: where does one stop and the other begin?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 4 Julio 2011
    ...v Miller [2011] HCA 9 A passenger involved in stealing a car was found to be owed a duty of care after the driver lost control of the vehicle and crashed into a The 16 year old plaintiff had been out drinking with her sister and cousins. After discovering the last train had gone and she had......
  • A duty of care can arise between joint participants in an illegal enterprise
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 19 Mayo 2011
    ...v Miller [2011] HCA 9 The High Court has found that (pursuant to s8 of The Criminal Code (WA)) a participant in a joint illegal enterprise can be owed a duty of care if, prior to the accident, they withdrew from the illegal enterprise. The fact that a plaintiff was involved in a joint illeg......
2 books & journal articles
  • Attributes and Attribution of State Courts — Federalism and the Kable Principle
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 40-1, March 2012
    • 1 Marzo 2012
    ...Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 209 CLR 597, 613 [46] (Gaudron and Gummow JJ), 643 [144]–[145] (Hayne J). 112 Miller v Miller (2011) 242 CLR 446, 469 [60] (French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ). 2012 Attributes and Attribution of State Courts 47 ____________________......
  • Heresy in the High Court? Federalism as a Constraint on Commonwealth Power
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 41-1, March 2013
    • 1 Marzo 2013
    ...Commitment to a Federal Relationship Possible?' (2008) 31 University of New South Wales Law Journal 395. 34 See, eg, Miller v Miller (2011) 242 CLR 446, 454 [13], 468–469 [59]–[60] (French CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel and Bell JJ); Equuscorp Pty Ltd v Haxton (2012) 86 ALJR 296, 320 [9......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT