Mills v Meeking

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date1990
Neutral Citation[1990] HCA 6,1990-0227 HCA A
Date1990
Year1990
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
128 cases
1 firm's commentaries
8 books & journal articles
  • STATUTORY INTERPRETATION IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2009, December 2009
    • 1 December 2009
    ...possible “as a matter of construction to repair that omission” (at [30]). However, this passage was in fact taken from Mills v Meeking(1990) 169 CLR 214 at 235, which Rajah JA in fact cited in Low Kok Heng as standing for the proposition he suggested above. 89 [1999] 2 SLR 499. 90 Cap 97, 1......
  • SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW ANNUAL LECTURE 2013 —“THE RULE OF LAW AS A MANY COLOURED DREAM COAT”
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...v Bond(1990) 170 CLR 321 at 356–358. 65 See, eg, Div 4 of Pt 7 of the Migration Act 1958 (Act No 62 of 1958) (Cth). 66Mills v Meeking(1990) 169 CLR 214 at 234, per Dawson J; Corporate Affairs Commission (NSW) v Yuill(1991) 172 CLR 319 at 339, per Gaudron J. 67(2011) 242 CLR 573. 68(2011) 24......
  • A MAN’S HOME IS [NOT] HIS CASTLE —EN BLOC COLLECTIVE SALES IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...SGHC 190 at [51]. 101 Land Titles (Strata) Act (Cap 158, 1999 Rev Ed), s 84A(7C). 102 Cap 1, 2002 Rev Ed. 103 [2007] 4 SLR 183. 104 (1990) 91 ALR 16. 105 (1990) 91 ALR 16 at 30—31. 106 (1990) 91 ALR 16 at 30—31. 107 Bill 28 of 1998. 108 Yong Hwai Ming v Koh Gek Hwa [2003] SGSTB 1 (“Dragon C......
  • Context and interpretation in anti-discrimination law.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 26 No. 2, August 2002
    • 1 August 2002
    ...stated in the Act or not) shall be preferred to a construction that would not promote that purpose or object. (22) Mills v Meeking (1990) 169 CLR 214, 234-5 (Dawson (23) D C Pearce and R S Geddes, Statutory Interpretation in Australia (5th ed, 2001) 27. (24) Metal Manufacturers Pty Ltd v Le......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT