Mills v Mills

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1938-0217 HCA A,[1938] HCA 4
Date1938
Year1938
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
86 cases
1 firm's commentaries
  • The responsibilities of becoming a director
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 17 Julio 2015
    ...Equitable duty of good faith and in the interests of the company. 3ss180(2)9b) of the Corporations Act 2001. See also Mills v Mills [1938] HCA 4; (1938) 60 CLR 150 (17 February 1938) and Hindle v John Cotton (1919) 56 Sc.L.R625. 4 s 182(1) (a) of the Corporations Act. Fundamentally it confi......
5 books & journal articles
  • Directors' fiduciary duties under our future company-law regime
    • South Africa
    • Juta South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 Mayo 2019
    ...at 671; Re City Equitable Fire Insurance Co Ltd (1925) Ch 407; Richard Brady Franks Limited v Price (1937) 58 CLR 112; Mills v Mills (1938) 60 CLR 150 at 188; Peters' American Delicacy Company Limited v Heath (1939) 61 CLR 457; In re Smith & Fawcett, Limited [1942] 1 Ch 304 (CA); Thorby v G......
  • Living on the Edge: Utopia University Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 27-2, June 1999
    • 1 Junio 1999
    ...the companywasalegal entity oritwasnot."65With respect, thingshavenever been so simple.62636465See, for example, Mills vMills (1938) 60 CLR 150; Ngurli Ltd vMcCann (1953) 90 CLR 425;Harlowe's NomineesPlyLtd vWoodside (Lakes Entrance) OilCoNL(1968) 121 CLR 483; Hogg vCramphorn Ltd [1967]Ch25......
  • A ‘fair and reasonable proposal’ by the board may still amount to a breach of duty to exercise directors’ powers for a proper purpose
    • South Africa
    • Juta Journal of Corporate Commercial Law & Practice No. , May 2020
    • 22 Mayo 2020
    ...the accomplishment of which formed the real ground of the board’s 30 Eclairs Group Ltd v JKX Oil & Gas PLC supra note 24 para 17.31 (1938) 60 CLR 150. © Juta and Company (Pty) 37A ‘FAIR AND REASONABLE PROPOSAL’ BY THE BOARD MAY STILL AMOUNT TO A BREACH OF DUTY TO EXERCISE DIRECTORS’ POWERS ......
  • FAMILY-OWNED FIRMS IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2011, December 2011
    • 1 Diciembre 2011
    ...65. 49Tokuhon (Pte) Ltd v Seow Kang Hong[2003] SGHC 65 at [120]. 50Tokuhon (Pte) Ltd v Seow Kang Hong[2003] SGHC 65 at [122]. 51(1937–38) 60 CLR 150. 52 Robert Flannigan, “Fiduciary Duties of Shareholders and Directors” [2004] Journal of Business Law 277 at 285–286. Because the joint stock ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT