Milpurrurru v Indofurn Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1994-1213 FCA A
Year1994
Date1994
CourtFederal Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
14 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • Decisions in brief
    • United States
    • ABA General Library Landslide No. 16-4, June 2024
    • 1 June 2024
    ...11, 2008), https://www.wipo.int/ edocs/mdocs/tk/en/wipo_grtkf_ic_13/wipo_grtkf_ic_13_4_b_rev.pdf. 14. See, e.g. , Milpurrurru v Indofurn Pty Ltd (1994) 130 ALR 659 (Austl.). 15. (1998) 41 IPR 513 (Austl.). 16. Id. 17. See Antik Batik v. IM Prod., Tribunal de grande instance [TGI] [ordinary ......
  • Dead loss: damages for posthumous breach of the moral right of integrity.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 40 No. 1, August 2016
    • 1 August 2016
    ...example, additional damages have been awarded for hurt feelings resulting from copyright infringement: see, eg, Milpurrurru v Indofurn (1994) 54 FCR 240; Monte v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd [2015] FCCA 1633 (7 August 2015) where the reproduction of a photograph caused the applicant e......
  • The Sub-Commission's Initiative on Human Rights and Intellectual Property
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights No. 22-2, June 2004
    • 1 June 2004
    ...keepers of the clan’s knowledge on behalf of theirpeople. See Blakeney, loc.cit. (note 46).51Milpurrurru & Ors vs Indofurn Pty. & Ors, (1994) 54 FCR 240 the image, alleging cultural harm suffered by the clan as a whole. The HighCourt of Australia tried to compensate the Aborigines for the c......